![]() |
Switching speed would be the sum of the on-state current rise/fall times.
IE: Rise = 4uS, Fall = 3uS. Total = 7uS so 1S/7uS = 142857.blah blah blah which is about 142 kHz. |
Quote:
(Resistive Switching Characteristics) where I look for the Switching Speed in the datasheet? |
It should be listed under the "dynamic characteristics" table.
|
Let me see the FDS5672 has a Rise Time of 20ns and a Fall Time of 14ns. The 60V MOSFET that I would like has a Rise Time of 15ns and a Fall Time of 5.5ns.
|
Oo nS! I like it! That would be ~29 MHz for the first one and ~48 MHz for the second.
|
Me too! Get it done man! :smile:
|
Quote:
|
Billionths of a second is good. It means you could run higher-pole motors at higher speeds without cogging like the BK controllers. :wink:
|
You guys are going to turn me into an :diablo: genius :lol:, but I do have to go with what Patrick says. If he gives the OK, then I'll try and get some stock on them. The 100V one I know there's stock of it, and the Tr is 15ns and the Tf is 9.3ns and will 0.01ohm make much difference?
|
Quote:
|
What is the current rating on the 100V? It's hard to say if the 0.01 ohm will matter, since there is usually less current flowing in a HV system the losses would be about the same as a LV but HC system with a lower resistance FET. Although 0.01 is about 5 times higher than average Rds for a FET.
|
Quote:
|
Compared to the 0.01ohm that 0.013ohm would be 30% higher resistance and so 30% higher losses at a set current. A 10W loss would become a 13W loss and so forth. Since you would have a bunch of them in parallel to handle motor current it wont matter too much. I take it you would get a smokin' deal on these FETs- is that why you're so interested in them a not one with a lower Rds?
|
Quote:
|
Well a 23s controller would be pretty awesome...with 8p per phase you could easily put 10KW through that thing!
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.