well i believe it should have a data logger... i never really believed that i needed one just yet, untill i went up in voltage... I think the MMMHV will have data logger built in... maybe not the 8s version, but hopefully the 12s version should...

The last I read Patrick say the 12s is further away than the 8s. Maybe it would be worth while getting a logger. Except that just draws out more time before you get more batteries. I don't have either battery your considering but I do have A123 which is similar to lifepo4. The high charge rate is a nice feature.

i am quite happy the 12s isnt going to be available for a couple of months or so... i think the 8s is releasing very soon right?
i am a little low on cash for my rc side of things, so gives me time just to test my new current setup before putting 9s in it and potentially ripping the whole thing apart.

I will wait for the esc to release before buying the nano tech lipos... And i may actually see how they perform in 2 weeks time as a mate has a set and he may come to a meet. So i will compare them to my hyperions and get a vid of the comparison in performance.

i will also need to get a better charger so i can make use of the high charge rates... charging 6500mah at 5 amps takes nearly 1hr30mins! FOR ONE LIPO!

CC's 8s ICE aircraft esc's have data-logging already.



Edit:
I've logged current draw on my large scale build:
http://www.rc-monster.com/forum/show...t=26979&page=7

My max currents were 90-125Amps (depending on 10s or 8s setup). My 30c 3600mah batteries should have easily been able to provide this, but I saw a big difference in performance (punch) between them and the 40c 5000mah I was also testing (All Turnigies).

So either, even at 10 samples/second, its not registering the highest current spikes, or the batteries are not up to spec. That convinced me to stick with the 40c batteries when recently buying new ones, since the numbers say the 30c 3600mah should be OK, but they weren't as good.

I can't say anything, however, about the 40c vs. 45c nano's though.

So your hyperions out perform anything you have even with dodgy solder.....
....and you would rather rip apart your car with higher voltage than higher c rating? I understand you why you are worried about heat issues with higher c and dodgy solder but it sounds like you have little faith in hyperion when the quick and easy fix would be...
I don't know what charger you use but if money is tight then you don't want to be getting batteries and charger to suit.

Brian - Thanks for that.. .i did follow that thread closely and was very impressed with your extended truck!

Panda
1. The hyperions are great, i just believe for the money spent, that the solder job from factory should have been of a higher quality...

2. i know i have contradicted myself a little with C ratings.... but i am also accounting for price of the lipos as well.
Nano tech 3s lipos are $75 5000mah... the hyperions i sourced were $110+...

3. hopefully by the time the ESC is available, i will have enough cash for the esc, lipos, and charger... Looking at the hyperion duo, but there are a few great chargers out there for less... i think i will also need a powersupply which can hack it, or i may just remove my 400watt power supply from my desktop.?

I've read a number of people talk about the highest amp spikes being missed. I would have thought of all the people here with loggers someone would have logged one of those spikes by chance. Yet I rarely hear of anyone getting over 200a. I think that is because the batteries have there limits and the loggers are reading the spikes. If I were to draw 300a or 400a spikes wouldn't that drop the voltage excessively and be noticable on the logger?

I think the problem with the spikes mentioned above is that they happen for such a small fraction of the second that it is not noticeable anywhere, or that the voltage drop associated with the spike is so minimal as well.

I understand where your coming from Jahay. Everyone wants bang for buck. Good luck deciding.

cheers buddy.... once the esc is available, i am probably going to need a little help understanding the results... so i will call on you soon enough... it may be quite interesting to see if the nano techs allow for a more detailed graph capturing the spikes??? we will see in due time...

I used to think that but the max draw on the system is for example landing a jump which lasts longer than 0.2 seconds. If a system is set up to rev out at 30k then the rotor spins 50 times each time the logger samples. That's at full revs! Spikes happen at lower revs (or the sudden drop in revs). So my pickled brain is having a hard time understanding why it doesn't have a lasting enough effect to be logged (even by accident). I don't really know how loggers work TBO. Do they sample for 0.2 seconds and average it out? Even at 10k revs the samples are taken every 33 revolutions. I would have thought somthing would be more noticable.

oh right, i am starting to get a better understanding of how it records its data, but im still completely flabbergasted by it all

Don't be flabbergastered Jahay. You have a good understanding of brushless and I've had lotsa beer :)

^ :lol:

As requested! I should also have the insides of a Blue Lipo too, since the leads are getting frayed at the entrance of the hardcase.

http://img37.imagefra.me/img/img37/7...pm_a832c6a.jpg
http://img37.imagefra.me/img/img37/7...qm_d9ed5c4.jpg