![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
3500w is the power of a 1520 ........... 4500w is for a 1717 ;) http://rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30091 |
Quote:
Anyhow, you can't run the 1717 at 9s +.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But seriously the 1520 would be a better option IMHO. Patrick from Castle stated that the diameter of the rotor being just the little bigger in the 1717 make the centrifugal forces so much more on the magnet and wrappings = More prone to failing when running those 60,000+ RPMs. And I do remember him saying that they were accidently testing to 100k when the MMM Combo first arrived with the same dia. rotor. Hence the 45k and 60k limits on either motor. Either way Castle IS coming out with new rotors for the 1717/1520 soon, So have at it! Video it and break some records. Just stop throttle if you hear a pop. My dad was running the 2650 on 6s for months and the rotor finally gave and his windings were OK because he didnt try to gas it IMO. This is a hobby and is meant to be entertaining, And It sure will be...:smile: |
..this oughta be good..
i love it when speed demons recklessly test the physical limits of rc components i own so that i don't have to :) |
Quote:
|
The 1717 won't last on anything over 45,000rpm.
The rotor will blow apart. Make sure you film it when it does. :-) |
just being a little out of the thread, but what kv would be better to run on 6s to get the highest speed?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What vehicle are you putting it in? If its light enough, the 2650kv can work. I put one in my rc8be on 5s geared for the moon, only for high speed runs. Hit 78mph before having to slam on the brakes do to lack of runway. http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x...E/IMAG0027.jpg http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x...E/IMAG0028.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ND0994?feature=mhee http://www.rc-monster.com/forum/pict...&pictureid=891 |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.