![]() |
Crimping powerpole 45 amp connectors
So I am wondering if I can find a set or crimping blocks for my Greelee ratchet crimper that will work with powerpole connectors... Some digging will be in order, and I plan to solder the wires after I crimp them for extra gangsta connections!
Any info on what you guys use will be handy! Tool is the Quik Cycle and currently has a die set for crimping coax. Looks like this but with a different die : http://www.toolup.com/greenlee/45541.html |
if you are also soldering the crimping is really unecessary, IMO. But it certainly would be extra gangsta.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Wheres BrianG when you need him, I am sure he has a 1/2 page explanation of why one is better than the other. Gotta love BG, he is like a knowledge keg. Just needs tapping every now and then (that sounds questionable...)
|
BrainG?
|
Edit - Another great read - http://hamslife.blogspot.com/2007/08...olderless.html
http://www.ezonemag.com/pages/faq/a108.shtml Quote:
|
Solderless connections have less resistance so they're more efficient.
The PWRCimp is a fairly inexpensive crimper that will do the 25amp, 35amp, and 45amp power poles. I've used this for years and as long as the crimps are done right, you don't need to add solder. |
Been crimping power poles on my Ebikes for over a year now. 1200 miles and not a failure yet. Can't say the same for my solder jobs....
|
The crimp I use http://www.powerwerx.com/product.asp...324&CtgID=3575
|
Linc, I typically just use needle-nose pliers to bend the crimp wings down so that they hold the wire while I solder it. That way, IF you need to remove the wire, you can just heat it up and pull it out since the crimp isn't holding it in.
I would say that a well-crimped connection will have no discernable difference in resistance compared to soldering. However, if you think about it, if you start with a crimped connection, and solder it, the soldering fills in the gaps between the round wires in the crimp. So that should have less resistance. No? |
+1 ^^^ i use those. but i have to hit the 45amp connector with the 25 or 35 sometimes to get a good snug fit.
I have heard conflicting arguments about soldering vs. crimps. But i think it comes down to this "if you have cold solder joints....your fuked":na: |
Ha ha, 1/2 page explanation eh? Anyway, here's my 1/4 page explanation:
Crimping It's fast; I can certainly crimp more connections than soldering. After all, it takes time to tin both sides and then solder them together. Also, crimping is easy when you have the right tools. Those are the only two pro-crimping arguments I can come up with. Soldering IMO, it's a better connection. Remember, wire is usually round, and the contact patch of a round object is limited when crimped. Soldering eliminates that. Also, soldering eliminates the chance of oxidation of the wires since they are more exposed (although I have seen crimps that are encased in a peanut-buttery goo to address that). Ever see a wire left bare after a year or so? Its surface is discolored and can't have the same conductivity as a fresh wire. And any increase in resistance using soldering might be attributed to the make-up of the solder. Lead-tin is probably not as good as silver (but much easier to use). Also, you have to know how to solder. Soldering also makes connector replacement easier; every time you want to replace a crimped connector, you have to cut it off and that shortens the wire each time. |
how bout price comparisons
|
The tricrimp looks good, I just need the dies to use in my greenlee though, but no one sells just the dies... Guess I am screwed and will have to buy the entire crimper. I plan to add flux to the wire, then crimp it, then feed a little solder in. Only reason I am crimping is a stock 45amp connector will not fit the plastic housing unless you bend the tabs. If I have to bend the tabs I may as well crimp it, right... It will mechanically hold the wire, and the solder can fill the gaps!
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.