Could Vancouver 2010 be the next 9/11?
 

http://dprogram.net/2010/01/25/could...-the-next-911/

Read it guys, there is some seriously fishy stuff going on. Send it to everyone you know, if it ends up happening, then the people will know, and turn the whole thing on it's head.

I have a friends who works on rigs, and a few years back said he met a guy that said he has been visited by two men (in black) "from the future"... :whistle:... and he said if there is a terrorist attack (false flag blame) at the Vancouver Olympics, then there will be a rise of martial law instated. Here is the weird thing, when the guy was told this, Vancouver wasn't even awarded the Olympic honors yet....

we're polishing the brass on the titanic, it's all going down man

I love it!!!

dude - that is exactly how I determine which emails/info I delete without even looking at it...
Y2.1K, here we come.......

if that really was the case,i doubt it would be displayed like this,i know there just some sneaky terrorist folk,but they are better than that....--josh

I think their more worried about actually having snow on the ground :lol:.
On a serous note I`m a little worried about this happening and recently a shipping company reported that they lost or miscounted the component(I think it was some kinda fertilizer) to make a bomb similar to what was used in the Oklahoma city bombing.But a biological attack by poisoning the water supplies make more sense,It would cripple and do mass damage.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say no. NBC just suffered a major disaster with their tonite show and Conan, having another major calamity would be extremely unlucky. Then again, they are a bunch of douches and you never know what the army of Coco will do. Hmm.

Just more of the same fear mongering. Jack shit aint gonna happen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbtmshpFGgw

Fear mongering? This is the opposite of fear mongering... most 50% of Americans believe in the official story of 9/11 which is complete bullshit.... now this time we are seeing the same suspicious activity that was reported the weeks and months before 9/11. Come on guys, the petty government of yours perpetrated this on you, and blamed it on some distant cave rat, give me a break! The whole thing is painfully, PAINFULLY obvious that they did it, and if you think not, then you have not looked at the footage and evidence AT ALL, NIL, ZERO, NADA.

Everything from the missing plane wreckage in the Shanksville, as well as the Pentagon, to the World trade center building 7 collapsing in a CLASSIC demolition manner, that was never hit by a plane and was something like 4 blocks or more away from the twin towers... but you never saw that on TV did you?! I wonder why? I don't even have to mention the twin towers how they came down, you guys should be able to figure this out on your own.

WTF, I was in grade 10 when during 9/11 and right when it happened I was like no way that tower came down! Then what do you know, the second one came down! okay, so we have the 1st, 2nd, AND 3rd worst structural failures within 8 hours, in history of steel structure buildings!

I'm not saying anything will happen, and I HOPE nothing does, I am merely showing some suspicious activity, much like the suspicious activity that was going on around 9/11 with demolition companies, the Fed, and military activity before and ON the day of 9/11.

ROTFLHAO. Might as well start distributing whatever you are smoking, cuz obviously its some pretty good stuff.

I mean obviously you never took a single science class as you show a complete lack of comprehension concerning physics and chemistry.

Do you really expect anyone to take you seriously when you lead in with "and a few years back said he met a guy that said he has been visited by two men (in black) 'from the future'"?

Come on.

P.S. When they do demolitions on buildings, they blow the entire building in a "controlled" floor by floor manner. They don't willy nilly (technically term) blow a hole somewhere in the middle, cross their fingers and hope for the best. Nor do they do it when the building, or nearby buildings especially for large buildings, are populated with people for goodness sakes.

Watch out if the Northern Lights start during the olympics....those are really controlled by the Bush-Bin-Hussein-Brezhnev consortium. You are already under their control - you just found out too early.....

thzero, notice the sarcasm? Notice the whistling face there in the first post?

How dare you talk to me like that, you obviously have not looked at anything pertaining to 9/11, why are you even arguing with me? Anyone who argues for the official story has with out a doubt not looked at the truth side to it, OR they simply don't have the common sense or brain power to figure it out on their own.

I would like to have a civil debate on this, just bring up the issue you have and we can simply debate it out like it should be. So please, show a point that you think I can't answer and I will argue it.

Thanks for the humor.... and as JTheisen said, be careful of those northern lights!

P.S. Everyone should wear their tinfoil hats to avoid being affected by the rays.

http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/8...sonpopcorn.gif

This should be fun. I got a kick out of watching the 9/11 conspiracy shows, great laughs!

Oh, and never mind the fact I have friends who saw the plane hit the pentagon................

Wow, didn't think there were that many children on this forum, I was wrong.

I melted an entire woodstove with a match once. So I believe the official story, absolutely.

Texas, what ever hit the pentagon, it wasn't a 767, we know that. Whoever your friends are, if they saw a 767 hit the pentagon, then where did it go?? There was not a shred of evidence that a large jet liner crashed there. Look at the hole.

Now if someone can give some evidence instead of acting like immature fools, please.

:rofl:

Yup, you got one right. It wasn't a 767, it was a 757.

http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html

You do know that website shows nothing for definitive evidence that a 757 hit don't you?

Jet engines look very similar inside structurally inside... and btw, I bet they didn't tell you that the engine debris was WAY to small to be from a 757.

http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm

im gonna retract my post and not even get in the middle of yalls shit fit.... which is headed no where fast.

They were designed to withstand MULTIPLE airplane impacts, multiple 767 air liner crashes that is. So if they fell down (at nearly free fall speed mind you) because of the planes impact alone, then why was the wreckage in a super compact demolition like pile? Why was there nano-thermite littered concrete powder all across Manhattan because of the pyroclastic flow when they came down?

Just take a look at the video I posted.

BASIC knowledge of physics says that a super strong massive steel building can fall in on it's own footprint at free fall speed? I don't think so. lol

The towers were built to withstand multiple hits from a 747, a much larger plane. They did this with the collision of a bomber into the Empire State Building from decades before in mind. WTC 1 and 2 were among the strongest, if not the strongest skyscapers ever built. Not to mention, the most fire resistant. We needed a pretext for a "hundred year war".

Every major war in history was started with false pretext. Hitler burned the Reichstag and blamed it on Poland. The CIA as gone on record admitting the Gulf of Tonkin incident was staged, the list goes on.

Whatever, believe what you will. I know trying to change minds is a useless endeavor. In 50 years when we're still in the middle east, and your grandson is drafted, some of this may make more sense.

It was the 747 ZP, I'm sure on that one. The architects designed that on the largest commercal airliner at the time, the 747 had only been out a few years.

And the molten steel under the rubble, MONTHS after the collapses. What was not molten was abruptly shipped off to China. Not standard procedure when dealing with a crime scene.

Thanks for the support Redshift. Right, 747, my mistake.

Redshift is right, the WTC were two of the strongest buildings ever built, and if the official story were true somehow, then they would also be, by far, the worst structural failures in the history of the USA.

I would like to hear someone explain WTC 7 though, this one has got to be good to hear. :tongue:

You could always do what the "9/11 commission report" did, COMPLETELY IGNORE IT. Or what the media did, show it once on the day of 9/11 and never show it again on mainstream TV. OR, even predict it 20+ min. before it even fell, BBC slipped up and got on the WTC 6 building demolition too early and said it had collapsed, when behind the reporter it was CLEARLY still standing.

Sure ZP, 7 was hit by a plane.

Wait, no it was supposed to be hit by a plane. That one hit the dirt in PA. I guess a newspaper somewhere on the first floor in WTC 7 got warm from the fire down the street, 50 stories up.

And why is it we get to see amateur footage from the ground in NYC, but all the security cam footage was confiscated from nearby gas stations, etc, near the Pentagon? Oh that's right.... they did show a few frames after like 7 years, no plane in any of the images. Most peculiar.

Also, I never really researched hard into the WTC incident, but I did hear, from many sources, (can't name them, forgot..) that the WTC towers were hit before, not sure if this is true, maybe someone can chime in and research.

But I have heard they have been hit before, not as big as a 747, however, it was hit, and was still standing.

Don't flame me, just throwing it out there.

Sorry you feel that way.

This has little to do with the first post, and i have no opinion on the whole Vancouver thing, but the info on 9/11 is comprehensive.

It is a pointless debate really, none of us can change the past and the majority of us can't change the future much either...

It's going nowhere because he can't argue with something that he can't argue with, it's irrefutable. But I want people to bring up issues, I want them to learn something, to think for themselves and not have everything news handed to them on a platter.

Rawfuls, I don't recall a plane hitting them before, doing a search on it just brings up 9/11... maybe you are referring to the first staged attack (under ground van bombing) on the towers in Feb. 1993?

Maybe, or I just might be a dumbo.
I'll look into it after I finish building my friends computer.

Reshift, maybe it was a mistake to bring up Vancouver obviously... but it's just that I feel that something might be brewing, I live in Canada, I don't want anything to happen, and I hope nothing happens. Did you take a look at that link in the first post? It lists all the suspicious activity going on around there. Our Parliament has been prorogued, what for??! What are they expecting? They refuse to give any reason for it, and it is in effect until just after the games are done, IIRC, March 3rd.

Yes. One tower was hit in the late 70s, I can't pull up info on it.

Yeah ZP I understand your concern. A lot of it is disinfo, and misinfo. Two different things. But between the two there is valid info, always. The problem with most semi-serious researchers, is they lack the discernment to see beyond the sensationalist and fall for the extremes. That's why there's always two polar opposing main sides, and two sides who are somewhat in agreement, on the hows, but maybe not the whys, for example.

I love this country, and according to MY Constitution, questioning the facts and history IS what makes a patriot.

Wasn't the Chrysler building or the Empire State building hit by a small plane?

Your the same dumbasses who believe 9/11 was an inside job. :lol:

Come on Freezbyte enough with the language. Come one Freebyte, do some research.

I don't think tinfoil is enough, I have an upside down colander on my head and a pencil up each nostril.

Does RCM have a "Most Retarded Thread Award"? If so, this one wins by a long shot. Congrats for being an "email-originated conspiracy theory believing dumbass."

Best I could do for you krawlin:

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p...mal_batman.jpg

That's exactly right.

This thread is done I take it, no one has two brain cells to put together an intelligent mature sentence anymore... I should have remembered that you can't discuss science with a die hard Christian. All they can do is side track and simply ignore the real issue. So all I can say is have fun with that, and good luck.

Cheers