![]() |
Team associated trying to break Rc speed record
They are shooting towards 200 MPH.
http://www.teamassociated.com/road_to_200/ Looks like they signed Nic case, the stream liner looks like the same body shell, color and sponsors. Driveline looks based on the tc5.. But Im not sure how a belt would fare at those rpm's |
They should of used maxamps.
|
:lol:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
oh snap. You are right. I wasn't thinking when I made the awesome suggestion. |
@ snellemin: hehehe...
The end of the clip where the car went flying into the air looked painful. |
Quote:
|
http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/h..._NicsSR104.jpghttp://i257.photobucket.com/albums/h..._NicsSR101.jpg
No belts just a solid shaft |
That link doesn't work for me.
|
Maybe they should find someone with a clue about aerodynamic and look at real vehicle that run at Bonneville salt flats.That huge front nose must create a huge aerodynamic drag
|
I was reading an article on Nic Case's work. all of his aero work was done in a wind tunnel.. Front surface area is relatively low. and what little there is has been designed to provide downforce.
What Nic had to say: Quote:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_3N0hwXEVK9...0/_DSC0011.JPG http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3N0hwXEVK9...0/_DSC0039.JPG http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_3N0hwXEVK9...0/_DSC0025.JPG http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_3N0hwXEVK9...0/_DSC0026.JPG Im really surprised that he went away from Flight Power to a company that I have never heard of (And i have been around for a while) I wonder how those cells compare to the FP's |
Quote:
http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/h...e/web/JCB3.jpg The underside of Nics car doesn't show the venturi's as well as the photo above but you can see evidence of them in the photos Ben posted |
How do you out-engineer the laws of physics? :lol:
|
You look at Indy car,F1 and the Bonneville salt flats all those use a front nose like a air plane have the lowest possible amount of aerodynamic drag on the front.Even look at ThrustSSC(worlds fastest car) and you`ll see what I`m trying to say.
|
Erevocanuk, the problem it that the minute physics of aerodynamics do not scale as perfectly as we thought even ten years ago. That's why F1 has a new variation of their wings and body nearly every year :-)
I think in Nic's design you can see by the open rear section that they are going for a heavy negative pressure under the entire body as opposed to wings and such to create downforce at the cost of high drag. |
Yeah, we need to find a way to contact him and get him on the forums :)
The only way to beat the laws of aerodynamics is the beat it senseless with lots of power.. a 1521 and 10s will do that :) |
Quote:
Word! |
Quote:
http://www.rc-monster.com/forum/member.php?u=4841 |
Just take a look at the nose on BloodHound SSC:
http://www.bloodhoundssc.com/news/latest_images.cfm 'tis huge :mdr: |
it would make perfect bird kabobs!
|
So whats the advantage of 4wd over 2wd in this case anyways? It's not like you have to worry about traction as that's really just a downforce/aerodynamics issue..
|
Im no expert but here is what i think..
You still need to accelerate this car, and 1521 and 10s lipo could easily demolish 2 tires, 4 tires give you that much more bite to get the car moving.. and you dont get downforce without motion. |
4wd drive gives you better torque management when accelerating. It also encourages better stability when off power as all wheels have 'drag' which keeps things straight
|
I would think it would also be a function of radio range also. The car needs to accelerate to 200 within the range of the radio, while a car at Bonneville has miles to reach top speed.
I would imagine the car has less than a mile to go 0 to 200. Pretty hard accel indeed. |
I seen this car earlier this year or late last year, supposedly went 165 mph on its maiden voyage. Cool car, I like the more scale or standard looking classes though. more fun and work going fast with limitations
|
Here is a youtube vid dated sept. 2010 showing a 162mph run
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAc4FnbZFYQ |
That thing is crazy fast...
|
The car (the SR 11)
Has been a blast to build, with the help of Curtis Husting. Curtis is very talented, creative - and also happens to be a nice guy. As you might have guessed - trying to make a wheel-driven R/C car achieve 200mph is very difficult. Over the years, failures have led to successes. Tires, gears, radio range, location, drive-train, traction, aero, set-up, gearing prediction, etc, are All problems that need to be solved… It's a lot of work, but worth it. :yes: Have a look at vid about success and failure -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiaPNlR5A4I Check this http://www.fast-rc.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=772.0 Have Fun, Go Fast N |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.