RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   Castle Creations (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Mamba XL ver2? (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29544)

brian015 03.13.2011 01:38 PM

Mamba XL ver2?
 
There's discussion over on the e-Baja forum of a Mamba XL version 2 being released:

http://www.hpibajaforum.com/forum/sh...=101688&page=3

Anyone know any details about this? What is different about v2? Thanks.

_paralyzed_ 03.13.2011 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian015 (Post 400837)
There's discussion over on the e-Baja forum of a Mamba XL version 2 being released:

http://www.hpibajaforum.com/forum/sh...=101688&page=3

Anyone know any details about this? What is different about v2? Thanks.

they explode less:whistle:

brian015 03.13.2011 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _paralyzed_ (Post 400845)
they explode less:whistle:

Alright, this is progress, but should I wait for the ones that don't explode at all? :neutral:













So, anyone with any real info could chime in. :wink:

Cody.McP 03.13.2011 04:03 PM

Well I'm pretty sure there were plans to icnrease the ESC to be able to use 10s or even 12s so maybe that could be in the new XL V2? Or maybe they are just fixing some problems them found?

brian015 03.13.2011 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cody.McP (Post 400849)
Well I'm pretty sure there were plans to icnrease the ESC to be able to use 10s or even 12s so maybe that could be in the new XL V2?

That will be the Mamba XL HV. So they're fixing problems with the XL, but I haven't heard exactly what.

lincpimp 03.13.2011 07:14 PM

Is it just me, or does someone need to make a really good bec design, and then sell it to all the esc mfgs. I would gladly pay another 20 bucks on a esc if the bec could handle 10amps, and was fully adjstable up to 12v or so and had some sort of failsafe in it that would not allow full voltage to go thru it in case of a failure... Or just pay for better components that do not fail...

I thought electric stuff was supposed to last forever, no moving parts. My 1943 Ithica 1911 still works correctly and it has 67 year old springs in it... and about 25+ moving parts.

ta_man 03.13.2011 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lincpimp (Post 400867)
I thought electric stuff was supposed to last forever, no moving parts. My 1943 Ithica 1911 still works correctly and it has 67 year old springs in it... and about 25+ moving parts.

That was a mission critical design. Nothing mision critical about consumer RC cars.

lincpimp 03.14.2011 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ta_man (Post 400896)
That was a mission critical design. Nothing mision critical about consumer RC cars.

True, but that was the days before any sort of cnc/cad anything... I guess it is just cost cutting and the general shape of the electronics parts business.

Jahay 03.14.2011 08:53 AM

Well didnt the MMM go through all the same explosion problems till version 3 was released...

I just believe that in such heavy vehicles and using motor brakes, and the esc to supply power to the servos etc... its just asking too much??? I havent heard of anyone blowing their ice hv esc that uses motor brakes and an external bec or hump pack yet....

I will never get this... i think i will be happy with my ice hv...

brian015 03.14.2011 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jahay (Post 400918)
I will never get this... i think i will be happy with my ice hv...

I am happy with my ICE hv - but I'd like to have reverse in my next build and avoid the need for mechanical brakes - so my plan is to get a Mamba XL eventually.

simplechamp 03.14.2011 10:37 AM

I think it's like any consumer product, if you want to be on the "bleeding edge" and be an early adopter of any new product you have to accept their may be issues. Comes with the territory. The thing that sets Castle apart is they have been very good about acknowledging issues and taking care of people who bought the earlier models.

Personally, I let all you chumps... er.. I mean friends, try out the stuff first then buy the v2 a year later. :wink:

Jahay 03.14.2011 11:36 AM

psh i will def come around to the HV ESC but i wont be parting with my cash till V3 haha

If reverse in required in my case (means running in a tight space)... i will just stick a regular MMM in there and just run 6s... If i have the space to run 9s then reverse is most probably not needed

DrKnow65 03.14.2011 05:46 PM

Has anyone other than me actually had an XL ignite?

Jahay 03.14.2011 05:49 PM

supposedly everyone running a baja has haha

brian015 03.14.2011 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrKnow65 (Post 400959)
Has anyone other than me actually had an XL ignite?

check the link in my original post - many evidently have

Shonen 03.14.2011 08:53 PM

I will be keeping an eye on this, I'm interested in what the weak point of the XLv1 is. Mine is still fine, but it's not nearly as loaded as the Baja conversion guys' XL's are.

DrKnow65 03.14.2011 09:17 PM

I'd like to hear from Castle about the "Crash voided warranty" statement one of the guys put up over on the root thread.

I just can't see that being the case?

Cody.McP 03.15.2011 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrKnow65 (Post 401001)
I'd like to hear from Castle about the "Crash voided warranty" statement one of the guys put up over on the root thread.

I just can't see that being the case?


Well my XL died after a crash, and they sent me a repaired/replaced unit free of charge...

edit: And I even stated in the repair form it was due to a crash so they were well aware.

padrino 03.15.2011 09:26 AM

Not sure what the percentage is for actual failures since they've sent out hundreds of combos by now. In my case no failure yet and built in BEC is holding up great. My only problems so far were getting my aftermarket chassis and conversion kit mated but a drill bit, dremel, left over GBE engine mount took care of things.

Now watch me post in a few days with a failure :)

Bmr4life 03.15.2011 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrKnow65 (Post 400959)
Has anyone other than me actually had an XL ignite?

How did you blow yours up?

BrianG 03.15.2011 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bmr4life (Post 401061)
How did you blow yours up?

He just let the smoke out too fast. The speed of the smoke escaping caused too much friction, which then caused the fire. All you need to do is regulate the speed of the smoke and there won't be a fire. :smile:

lincpimp 03.15.2011 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianG (Post 401069)
He just let the smoke out too fast. The speed of the smoke escaping caused too much friction, which then caused the fire. All you need to do is regulate the speed of the smoke and there won't be a fire. :smile:

Not to look down on you Brian, but i thik you have an oversimplified view of the "smoke"...

I have the personal belief that the black wire that returns the "electronpowerenergy (EPE)" (sorry for the technical term) is the root cause of most electrical failure. I am not alone here, as I am part of a highly advanced secret society whose members adhere to a stict code of silence. I just cannot help but say what follows as i think it is time.

If you go back to basic physics you will see that red items always go faster or perform better, ie all race cars are red, important items are red (caution signs, stop signs, stop lights, etc), women with red hair are much scarier than brunettes and the list goes on.

So the positive wire coming from the battery is always red, so the EPE can flow out best. But when it comes to braking the esc attempts to put the EPE back into the battery and is forced to do this thru a black wire. Since we know that red wire transmits the EPE fastest, it is only common sense that the black wire cannot keep up. So you end up with a backup of EPE and we all know what happens then. The EPE builds up a mass of power that must be disapated. So it undergoes a phase transformation to black smoke (stay with me, as this is getting rather technical). And since you cannot have 2 black items in the same space at the same time (law of conservation of matter) the smoke will transfer itself into an alternate universe for a microsecond and then reappear back in our universe on the outside of the black wire, usually blackeneing the area around it.

Possible cures for this? Well I do not have to tell you that more money is spent trying to keep EPE in than is spent curing cancer and maintaining Donald Trump's hair combined. I do think that the KISS princle should be applied here (rock and roll all night) and after we get over the hangovers and get tested for STDs we should change the color of the black wire to red. Now I know that it cannot be the exact shade of red as the positive, as the EPE would not know which wire to exit, and that may cause a time/space ripple that could have effects stretching across the cosmos. I for one do not want to go down in history as causing the sun to implode. And neither should you, no matter how much you want to trump Nixon for bad ideas.

So we must carefully balance the shade of red on the negative wire. Some setups may require a pink wire, others maroon. We need an impartial 3rd party to do this, and I nominate the free masons. They are generally old men, and while they cannot move fast they often have canes and those could be used to beat offenders. If we allow them to police this I feel the situation of smoking electronics could be completely avoided. Now we would need someone to watch over the masons, as the balance of power could shift to them, and we really do not need that to happen. Bricks would be everywhere and they would likely take over the concrete industry and build all kinds of useless stuff like mailbox surrounds and curbs.

Thoughts?

brian015 03.15.2011 11:28 AM

I like your proposed solution to the excess EPE buildup and am glad it doesn't involve pushing some stupid button every 108 minutes.

snellemin 03.15.2011 11:36 AM

I would omit the Mason and red shade all together and go with a intercooled black wire. Or crossdrilling of the wires can control the flow of smoke being released.

lincpimp 03.15.2011 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian015 (Post 401082)
I like your proposed solution to the excess EPE buildup and am glad it doesn't involve pushing some stupid button every 108 minutes.

We as a group spent considerable time trying to get around all of the button pushing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by snellemin (Post 401084)
I would omit the Mason and red shade all together and go with a intercooled black wire. Or crossdrilling of the wires can control the flow of smoke being released.

I agree that some measure of crossdrilling would help in the event of a failure. But the wire intercooling would be another failure point, and I really do not want to overload the masons, as they do need naps in the afternoon.

snellemin 03.15.2011 12:38 PM

How about covering the crossdrilled wires with bacon? In effect you get smoked crispy bacon upon a failure and will keep the Mason's happy.

BrianG 03.15.2011 12:50 PM

See, now you guys are overthinking the smoke thing. I'm telling you, it's the friction from the smoke that causes problems. The correct answer is usually the simple one.

By the way, red items don't go any faster, they just appear that way because the color grabs your attention. It's all about perspective.

What DOES make things go faster is a flame graphic (sticker/decal/paint). That has been proven a number of times in controlled, repeatable tests. The reason behind this is a little more complex though. What happens is the various colors of the flame graphic cause thermal variances just above it which positively interact with the airflow from the object in motion. This redirects turbulence in a controlled manner to provide the least amount of air resistance when traveling at high speed. Of course, this only works on a planet with a yellow sun and when it is at an ideal angle at noon in a narrow temperature range, so changes to the flame orientation, color gradients, and flame tongue curvature must be made for maximum efficiency depending on geographical location, temperature, and time of day. Fortunately, the design of the common flame graphics are such that they work well in a variety of locations; you just don't get the maximum benefit as you would with a specifically tuned graphc. In the R/C world, our vehicles are scaled down by X amount, which means the variances in flame efficiency are X order of magnitude less (efficiency variances scales down by model scale), so even a "generic" flame graphic has almost the same performance as a perfectly tuned one. Incidentally. this is why R/C vehicles can have pretty much any flame kind/size/color/geometry and they all drastically improve performance almost equally; even more so the smaller the vehicle. Don't try that on a real 1:1 car though and expect good results; stick to a properly designed flame graphic when at larger scales!

lincpimp 03.15.2011 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snellemin (Post 401098)
How about covering the crossdrilled wires with bacon? In effect you get smoked crispy bacon upon a failure and will keep the Mason's happy.

True, masons love bacon.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianG (Post 401099)
See, now you guys are overthinking the smoke thing. I'm telling you, it's the friction from the smoke that causes problems. The correct answer is usually the simple one.

By the way, red items don't go any faster, they just appear that way because the color grabs your attention. It's all about perspective.

What DOES make things go faster is a flame graphic (sticker/decal/paint). That has been proven a number of times in controlled, repeatable tests. The reason behind this is a little more complex though. What happens is the various colors of the flame graphic cause thermal variances just above it which positively interact with the airflow from the object in motion. This redirects turbulence in a controlled manner to provide the least amount of air resistance when traveling at high speed. Of course, this only works on a planet with a yellow sun and when it is at an ideal angle at noon in a narrow temperature range, so changes to the flame orientation, color gradients, and flame tongue curvature must be made for maximum efficiency depending on geographical location, temperature, and time of day. Fortunately, the design of the common flame graphics are such that they work well in a variety of locations; you just don't get the maximum benefit as you would with a specifically tuned graphc. In the R/C world, our vehicles are scaled down by X amount, which means the variances in flame efficiency are X order of magnitude less (efficiency variances scales down by model scale), so even a "generic" flame graphic has almost the same performance as a perfectly tuned one. Incidentally. this is why R/C vehicles can have pretty much any flame kind/size/color/geometry and they all drastically improve performance almost equally; even more so the smaller the vehicle. Don't try that on a real 1:1 car though and expect good results; stick to a properly designed flame graphic when at larger scales!

Red items go faster. Why are all ferrari's painted red? Enzo knew back then, and he did not have any computer to tell him.

Now your flame decal theory is interesting. Do you think we could apply flame decals to the black wires in order to balance out the EPE flow? Any help will better than none, and flame decals would be easier to retrofit. Alot easier to tell the power companies that they do not need to replace 10s of thousands of miles of black wire. And any idiot can stick a sticker on.

DrKnow65 03.15.2011 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bmr4life (Post 401061)
How did you blow yours up?

My first XL went up in flames for no appearent reason. No crash, no motor failure, no overheated, no reason. Castle called it a manufacturing defect and promptly replaced it.

I believe I had one of the very first few retail XL's and mine lasted about a week. I have had the replacement up and running for ~2 months now without issue :-)

BrianG 03.15.2011 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lincpimp (Post 401105)
Red items go faster. Why are all ferrari's painted red? Enzo knew back then, and he did not have any computer to tell him.

Now your flame decal theory is interesting. Do you think we could apply flame decals to the black wires in order to balance out the EPE flow? Any help will better than none, and flame decals would be easier to retrofit. Alot easier to tell the power companies that they do not need to replace 10s of thousands of miles of black wire. And any idiot can stick a sticker on.

Red items don't go faster. Like I said, they just appear to because they are brighter and catch your attention easier. Paint one brick red and another black, throw both of them with equal power and see which one is faster. Ferrari paints their cars red because people don't know better and they are just cashing in on the ignorance.

Flame graphics only work on surfaces exposed to the outside. Inside the vehicle, they make no difference. You need proof? Repeat the brick throwing test outlined above, except replace the bricks with a certain flame-labeled lipo pack and a "regular" non-flame pack. Make sure both weigh the same.

snellemin 03.15.2011 03:12 PM

I've seen a rainbow Ferrari with green flames go as fast as a 1981 Toyota Corolla with red flames. Corolla had cross drilled exhaust tips and the Ferrari cross drilled brake pads. Dunno if that made a difference, but both used Bacon infused nitro.

DrKnow65 03.15.2011 03:40 PM

I've heard those rainbow colored ones go just as fast both ways ;-)

Shonen 03.15.2011 03:53 PM

Hmm...intriguing theories. If only they would coat the heatsinks and PCBs in teflon, the smoke wouldn't cause any damage...maybe on the XL v2.1?

_paralyzed_ 03.15.2011 04:38 PM

Bacon, EPE, Proper flame curvature. This here is a good thread.:yes:

On topic- all failures seem to be bec related, not because of motor brakes or reverse.

I will simply run a rx battery pack. There is a great big spot for a battery in the stock radio box- I'll put my battery there.

brian015 03.15.2011 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _paralyzed_ (Post 401134)
On topic- all failures seem to be bec related, not because of motor brakes or reverse.

That's what I've been reading as well. Has anyone heard of failures while running an external bec or rx pack?

With that, the off-topic discussion may continue...

:na:

snellemin 03.15.2011 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrKnow65 (Post 401121)
I've heard those rainbow colored ones go just as fast both ways ;-)

Something Vin Diesel would quote.

lincpimp 03.15.2011 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snellemin (Post 401148)
Something Vin Diesel would quote.

Don't say his name, Harold will become all moist...

Kirkinsb 03.16.2011 12:02 AM

Yep, mine failed using an external RX pack. Bummer...was running so good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJpjuC9AzWc

_paralyzed_ 03.16.2011 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lincpimp (Post 401160)
Don't say his name, Harold will become all moist...

the joke is on you Lincpimp, my diaper is always moist.:whistle:

Cody.McP 03.16.2011 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _paralyzed_ (Post 401134)
Bacon, EPE, Proper flame curvature. This here is a good thread.:yes:

On topic- all failures seem to be bec related, not because of motor brakes or reverse.

I will simply run a rx battery pack. There is a great big spot for a battery in the stock radio box- I'll put my battery there.

Hmm, that's strange. I'd rather have them without a BEC so there wasn't that part to fail. Rather use a CCPro BEC, as even if that burns up it's not a huge deal. I wonder if I should switch to an external BEC? Mines running fine so far.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.