![]() |
Motor rebuild kits: 1410 and 1415
We are finally ready to start shipping the motor rebuild kits for the 1410 and 1415 motors. Like our other rebuild kits, it includes the rotor, front endbell with bearing, extra bearing, rotor shims and endbell screws.
We have 4 different rebuild kits available: 1410 w/3.2mm shaft (P/N 011-0022-00) 1410 w/5mm shaft (PN 011-0023-00) 1415 w/3.2mm shaft (P/N 011-0024-00) 1415 w/5mm shaft (PnN 011-0025-00) So yea, if you're looking for a 5mm shaft for your 1410 or 1415 we finally have an upgrade option. Enjoy! Thomas Porfert Tech Support Castle Creations |
Thomas
Best news of the day !!!! Thank you Castle !!!! :yipi: |
No 1406 kits? Oh well the endbells on the front are all the same right? Guess I will just have a rotor for sale unless someone has a front endbell and bearing(3.2 mm) they would be willing to let go. My buddy has a rig dyin for this 4600 1406 four pole.
|
Thomas
Can i also order a 1415 with 5mm Shaft on the Castle Website ? Would save me buying the extra rotor |
Quote:
Interesing observation: There is a significant difference in the magnetic detent strength between the early motors with the short wires and the later motors with the longer wires. About as much and maybe even more difference than between a Castle 1512 and a Castle 1518 (both of which I own). Another way to characterize this: The difference in magnetic detent strength between the short wire 1410s and the long wire 1410s is greater than the difference between the 1406 and the short wire 1410. At least to my fingers. Is this difference because of a change in the magnets? And so the real question: Do the rebuild kits have the same magnets on the rotors as the later 1410s with the long wires? I'm sure the length of the wire is incidental, and just indicates a running change in the spec for wire length but it curious that all the long wire motors I've had have apparently stronger magnets. I realize this effect could, alternatively, be a design change in the stator, so I'm asking the question. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Unfortunately the front endbells are not the same between the 1410/1415 and the 1406 motors. The 1406 has a shallower bearing recess on the inside of the endbell, so if you try to use the one from the 1410/1415 the deeper bearing recess causes it to press against the rotor and bind ups the rotor. Thomas Porfert Tech Support Castle Creations |
Awesome
|
Just got a used 1415 so i just need a new rotor :party:
|
Anyone know the size of the front bearing in the 1406? Would call cc but they are always closed when I get home from work. If I could find one I might have a crack at the outer race removal from the front endbell.
|
Quote:
NMB : 14x5x5mm |
Thanks Patrick. Time to resurect the four pole monster for my sc trucks.
|
So how far away are the rebuild kits for the 1518, 1520 and the 1717????
I need a rebuild kit for my 1717 as I want to try it on 8S for a couple packs and then rebuild it with a fresh rotor just in case. Also having bought the other motors too it would be nice to have rebuild kits on the shelf for a rebuild later on down the track. Almost cringe at the thought of the price for the 1717 rebuild kit. Would have to be way more than what I paid for it. LOL. The rebuild kit for the 1415 is what I paid for my 1717 motor. Sad in a way but can't complain since I got the motor (and few others) for a steal.:yipi: |
Just got my 1415 and 1410 5mm rotor...
The 1415 is even more impressive than the 1410 Castle Great Job and thank you bringing the 5mm rotors along |
Quote:
http://www.rc-monster.com/forum/show...12&postcount=8 |
Quote:
I noticed in the latest RC Car Action that you are now going to offer the 1410 with the MM Pro in a racer SC package w/5mm rotor, Can that package be got with a 1/8 rotor? I have an ST (T4) that i would love to use that in, But finding 5mm 48 pitch pinions will be a Bugger and a rebuild kit just to convert would be a watse |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There has been two small changes in the magnet design on the 14xx series since we started building them. Neither of them has anything to do with the cost of magnets (unfortunately.) One was to make the rotors more consistent from production run to production run (magnet alignment) The other was to improve back-emf matching. So yes, you might feel some difference between earlier and later build-date motors. Thanx! Patrick |
Quote:
1) What does "improved back-emf matching" do for us in terms of motor control, driveability, or performance? 2) Would it be correct to assume that since the rebuild kits came out after the first of the newer dresign motors with the stronger detent feel, that the rebuild kit rotors would be the same as the newer design rotors in the motors? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.