RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   mello hello (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=13013)

crawler max 06.22.2008 10:59 PM

mello hello
 
has anyone out there built a nitro t max into a crawler. do you have any helpful advice on gear reduction. i am aware that electric is most ideal but nitro is in my veins.

lincpimp 06.22.2008 11:03 PM

Is it a 3.3 or the older style? With the older style you can go to a 72t spur and the smallest clutchbell, 14t?

If you want more reduction you could buy a set of hybrid bulks and use 1/8 truggy gearsets, 43/10 ratio. Kind of expensive, but not much else you can do unless you fabricate a tranny with a lower ratio.

The 3.3 tranny uses much smaller spurs, than the old maxx. If you put a large spur on that it would offer a lower ratio for better crawling. Not sure if there is enough adjustment on the motor to fit though.

Either way you will most likely have to fab some parts...

crawler max 06.22.2008 11:10 PM

thanks i own the 2.5 but i have a friends 3.3 to experiment with. fab not a prob, i m a welder and fabricator. do you know of a 14t in 32pitch? if so it would allow room for bigger spur gear. ever heard of a steel spur bigger than 72?

lincpimp 06.23.2008 01:13 AM

Sorry, was thinking of mod1 clutch bells, the smallest 32p that I could find was a 17t. I had a look and the 72t seems to be the largest that I can find.

I also made mention in your other post "bring it" that you cold adapt a new emaxx tranny to the truck. You would have to trim the chassis, and fab mech brakes. But having a selectable high and low gear would be worth it to me. Sounds like a fun project...

Also, flm make an adapter to mount a new emaxx tranny on the old chassis, which may work with your tmaxx.

crawler max 06.23.2008 01:31 AM

i was thinking about a planetary spur gear or hubs. or using idler gears between spur and clutch. a reduction at the hubs would reduce stress on the drivetrain. but 4 times the work. i cant cut gears though.

lincpimp 06.23.2008 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crawler max (Post 184642)
i was thinking about a planetary spur gear or hubs. or using idler gears between spur and clutch. a reduction at the hubs would reduce stress on the drivetrain. but 4 times the work. i cant cut gears though.

Interesting, I like planetary gearboxes. Just built a tamiya cr-01 and it has the planetart tranny, it works great. I would probably scarp the tmaxx tranny in favor of the emaxx tranny and make a mount for the mech brake. Seems like the easiest way out! But I do like your hub reduction idea...

BP-Revo 06.23.2008 01:35 AM

Traxxas makes a 16T 32P clutchbell. That I know for sure. I don't recall anyone making a 14T though...

lincpimp 06.23.2008 01:40 AM

Looking at the numbers, if you put a tmaxx 3.3 tranny in it, and run 72/16 primary gearing, you will have a 42:1 reduction, which should be fine for crawling. You can back off the 2 speed adjustment so that it will not shift into 2nd, and most likely have around 15mph max speed.

crawler max 06.23.2008 01:42 AM

ya 16t is what i run, goes through bearings fast and gets chewed by my rrp spur. i m going to try hardening one.

TexasSP 06.23.2008 11:55 AM

Good info on maxx crawler conversions here:

http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=13

brushlessboy16 06.23.2008 12:16 PM

http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXVP66&P=7

crawler max 06.23.2008 12:42 PM

has anyone ever tried an assosiated bell with a traxxas 2.5 motor? the bearings must be tiny. 14t would be a 5.14 primary ratio. that is very good. 16t= 4.5:1 .


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.