![]() |
Charging li-pos w/out using a balancer...can it be done?
A friend of mine says it can be done, I am not so sure. I always use a ballancer w/mine when I charge so I have never tried it. So, can it be charged through the Deans plug only? ( I have a $ 20- wager on this one!)
|
You lost $20... Yes it can be done it just doesn't balance... Some people balance then charge without the balancers.
Others only balance every few charges. Some do it all the time. Either way you are out $20... |
I only balance my 5S packs as they have more cells to deal with. My 2 and 3S lipos, I hardly balance them.
|
I've been waiting on a balance adapter so I can use my apache 505 balancer with the Flight Power 4s evo I got. I've put probably 20 or more cycles on it since I got it. Think I should hold of using it until I can balance it? It's been taking a while for the adapter to show up. Got it from Hugo @ truerc Cananda. Probaly in some customs office being inspected right now. I balance my 2s's and 3s's, not as often as I use to but usually before a charge.
Sorry about the 20 magman and the hijack. Thread seemed dead so thought I'd add on. You should be able to get the 20 back when you run into a new lipo user. |
I charge and then balance my packs. I find they get balanced better, despite the extra time needed. It takes forever to balance my 5s packs evenly!
|
with higher quality cells I have found there is a less of a need to balance...if you run MaxAmps packs you HAVE to balance each time
|
Honestly, as expensive as lipos are, I think it is stupid not to use a good charge thru balancer while charging. A fp vbalancer or a hyperion lba10 would be my recomendation. Plus you get a fair amount of safety with a charger-thru balancer, as they will interupt the charge if one cell goes over or under voltage.
I know that some like to charge then balance, that is a bad idea. If the pack is well out of balance, a full charge could over volt one or more cells. Balancing before the charge does not make much sense either, as one cell may take more charge than another... Better matched packs do not have this problem as much, but the cheaper packs will. For 40 bucks get a good balancer, well worth it. Or look around for a used lba10, they are for sale frequently. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You can balance before the charge and the charge w/o the balancer to 4.1 volts/cell. Unless the cells are really out of sync with each other, this is the surest way you will not damage your cells, though not the safest.
If you charge with a balancer, you can get the maximum performace out of you pack, because each cell will take the exact amount of charge that it needs. However if the cells in that pack have various capacities, you could risk damaging your pack as the cell with the lowest capacity will dump first, possibly before the entire pack voltage reaches the cut off. Bottom line: Charge with a balancer and be conservative on the lvc voltage if your cells are matched. OR balance your cells and then charge to 4.1 volts/cell w/o a balancer if your cells aren't so matched anymore. |
I used to do the charge then balance method (or rather - charge for about 1/2 way, then balance and then complete the charge).
I don't think it smart to do a full charge and then balance - if you do this and one cell is way out of whack it can cause one or more of the other cells to get way over 4.2v when the charger is looking at the total package voltage before switching from CC to CV charge. If this happens you end up doing more harm than good. This past spring I got a TP 1010 charger with a TP210 balancer. The balancer is opto-coupled to the charger and there is a full communication with the charger through the whole charging process. You can monitor all the cells in the pack throughout the charging process and if one cell gets too far out of whack it will drop the charing current to 0.3A until the balancer can get everything in sync. I now balance with every charge and all has been good. I think if you are using cheap packs or you run your lipos to a 3.0V LVC frequently you will need to balance more often than if you run a higher lvc - I run 3.3v now as my lvc and have had no problems. |
Do not agree with you on this:
You can balance before the charge and the charge w/o the balancer to 4.1 volts/cell. Unless the cells are really out of sync with each other, this is the surest way you will not damage your cells, though not the safest. Without the balancer monitoring the cells there is no gaurantee that the cells will take an equal charger, even if they are balanced before the charge. You could still have a cell that gets out of balance with the low charge rate. Plus not every charger will allow for a 4.1v cutoff. If you charge with a balancer, you can get the maximum performace out of you pack, because each cell will take the exact amount of charge that it needs. However if the cells in that pack have various capacities, you could risk damaging your pack as the cell with the lowest capacity will dump first, possibly before the entire pack voltage reaches the cut off. The balancer does not regulate the amount of charge that each cell receives, it just bleeds off the higher voltage cells to match the lower ones. Big benefit of using a charge thru balancer is that I can interrrupt the charge if there is an issue with the cells going over or under voltage... Bottom line: Charge with a balancer and be conservative on the lvc voltage if your cells are matched. OR balance your cells and then charge to 4.1 volts/cell w/o a balancer if your cells aren't so matched anymore. I really do not see what your 4.1v method will do. You might as well just charge the lipo normally, risk is the same. |
I only ballanced mine about every 10 runs (before I charged). I thought it was ok b/c thats what I was told to do. I now have a cellpro 10s charger that ballances through out the charge and wow what a difference. This is the only way I will charge my expensive lipos. It a peace of mind
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.