RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   Brushless (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   difference between quark air master and monster pro (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15722)

Burnsi 10.08.2008 07:41 AM

difference between quark air master and monster pro
 
hi,

iīm thinking about to buy a quark air master for my cars.
whats the difference to the quark monster pro?

are these esc a good choice for building a buggy/truggy like a jammin or st-1?
i wanna use a123 cells, i thought about 5s.

thx

BL_RV0 10.08.2008 09:02 AM

The air master is a plane or helicopter-oriented controller. It has only weak drag brakes and no reverse. The monster pro is a car-oriented controller and has strong proportional brakes, as well as reverse. Quarks are smooth controllers, great for running neu and mega motors, but they heat & thermal often and sometimes burn. A buggy or truggy would be a suitable vehicle for a quark, just make sure you have adequate cooling to it. Mike (owner) makes a heatsink for the qquark 125 controllers, seen here: http://www.rc-monster.com/proddetail.php?prod=RCM008 I hope this helps. Also, for A123, consider a 2p configuration. The 5s1p would have a hard(er) time getting enough amps to your motor, and could decrease potential performance.

Burnsi 10.08.2008 09:32 AM

ok, then the air master insnīt a good choice for me.
i want build a hyper7 buggy and maybe my x2 crt truggy.
every vehicle get a motor, but the esc should be used in both cars. same for the a123 packs (*s2p).
iīm looking for a cheap alternative for a esc.

heatsink i can do for myself, i got a cnc machine.

BrianG 10.08.2008 09:53 AM

It's not just the heatsink, but the thermal pads Quark uses to secure the PCB to the case. Not only is it not the best thermal conductor, but it sometimes "lets go" and the FETs don't even touch the case anymore. There is a mod that removes these pads and uses thermal adhesive instead, but that voids the warranty and need to create a new spacer slab. Just search around and you'll eventually see the mod details.

Once the mod is done though, it helps a TON. I ran a 125B in my old Revo and still in my Hyper8 buggy and they worked great. They are VERY smooth even at really slow speeds. I still think they are smoother than the MM or MMM even with the newer software.

Burnsi 10.08.2008 09:58 AM

ok, the a quark esc is good and cheap for me?
mmm is bad for me because i must order in usa and when the esc is broken i have high fees for sending it back. i read much bad thing for this esc, its often burns. whats about the v3 version? shall i wait for it? i think this is the cheapest esc for 6s?

will i need the quark 125a or can i use the 80a version?

BL_RV0 10.08.2008 10:02 AM

125 or 80 depends on what your planned setup is. For a CRT I'd go with a Neu 1515 2.5d or 1.5y on 5s. With that setup you *should* be able to use the 80a, but the 125a is a safer choice.

BrianG 10.08.2008 10:02 AM

The 125A is basically the same capabilities as the Mamba Max ESC; same FETs (at least in the older MM ESCs) and the same number of them. I would rate the 80B more like a sidewinder.

That said, I think Quark optimisitically rates their ESCs, so I would definitely go no lower than the 125B.

BL_RV0 10.08.2008 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burnsi (Post 220524)
ok, the a quark esc is good and cheap for me?
mmm is bad for me because i must order in usa and when the esc is broken i have high fees for sending it back. i read much bad thing for this esc, its often burns. whats about the v3 version? shall i wait for it? i think this is the cheapest esc for 6s?

will i need the quark 125a or can i use the 80a version?

Also, I'd get the quark in your part of the world. Castle is sort of a USA controller. I hope all with the V3 MMM's go well, and then they can be shipped worldwide without fear of frying, and huge return shipping prices.

BL_RV0 10.08.2008 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianG (Post 220528)
The 125A is basically the same capabilities as the Mamba Max ESC; same FETs (at least in the older MM ESCs) and the same number of them. I would rate the 80B more like a sidewinder.

That said, I think Quark optimisitically rates their ESCs, so I would definitely go no lower than the 125B.

Are you serious? I'd think a quark 65 would be like a sidewinder, and the 80a model more like a MM.

Burnsi 10.08.2008 10:09 AM

ok, i thought about to use a feigao 540l for buggy and crt.5 and a xl for truggy.

wich esc up to 250 - 280$ would be the best choice for me?
is it possible for using the same esc in every car?

Burnsi 10.08.2008 10:51 AM

hi,
somebody know mgm escīs?
found one wich has 120a and its from czech (not far from me)

http://mgm-compro.com/index.php?tid=...-boat-e-series

will this esc work for my buggy/truggy conversion?

TexasSP 10.08.2008 11:06 AM

Yes and they are good solid ESC's. They are not as smooth as the Quark or MMM though.

A4DTM 10.08.2008 04:18 PM

burnsi, if you still go w/ a quark, and want to mod it, look here: http://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6529

Burnsi 10.08.2008 04:54 PM

thx for the thread.

damn, i cant decide whats the better esc for me.
i have no clue about brushless, i want the best setup for my money :)
i cant buy a quark esc here in germany, i must order at korea.
then i have to pay tax and custom for it.

mgm is czech, so i have to pay nothing of these.

but the winter is comming, then i cant drive. then i have enough time to decide :)

TexasSP 10.08.2008 05:35 PM

Go with MGM. Quarks service has been questionable as of late. MGM has excellent service and being so close to you that is who I would pick.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.