RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   Brushless (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   4 or 5lipos ? (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22073)

speedy 07.04.2009 06:01 PM

4 or 5lipos ?
 
Hi !

I have an ass rc8e ands a cc-mmm 2200kv combo that i'm going to race with :O) but i don't know if i chould use 4 or 5s lipo's ? What do you guy's think ?

BrianG 07.04.2009 06:27 PM

Either will work, but for a given speed, 5s will be gentler on the batteries and runtime will be longer. So, whatever speed you gear for on 4s, gear down for 5s to get the same speed.

big greg 07.04.2009 06:50 PM

i use both, if i have to make a little longer race i throw a 5s pack in there, since there is more total energy in the pack

fsracer 07.05.2009 12:20 PM

I prefer to race with 5s liking the speed and power that I get from 5s.

E-Revonut 07.05.2009 12:51 PM

use the calculator on BrianG's signature to see what speeds you will get with either battery and what gearing you'll need to run for that speed. Sometimes the higher voltage won't let you gear down enough for usable speeds on the race track.

SpEEdyBL 07.05.2009 03:05 PM

No, no, no, don't go 5s. There are a few good reasons why 4s is better in your situation. For one, the amount of power available is way, way to much for any type of track. You don't want something that is comfortable for 50-60 mph when you are spending most of the time going less than 30 mph. With the low throttle that you will be using most of the time, you will be heating up the esc a lot. Even if you geared way down, the motor will be spinning for nothing, and eat up your packs in a hurry. Reason 3 is the fact that 5s is taller than 4s. You want the lowest center of gravity for the best handling.

zeropointbug 07.05.2009 04:17 PM

4s would be better for racing. Just get some good batts, like 30C and 5500mah or more of capacity and you should be good.

big greg 07.05.2009 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpEEdyBL (Post 301719)
No, no, no, don't go 5s. There are a few good reasons why 4s is better in your situation. For one, the amount of power available is way, way to much for any type of track. You don't want something that is comfortable for 50-60 mph when you are spending most of the time going less than 30 mph. With the low throttle that you will be using most of the time, you will be heating up the esc a lot. Even if you geared way down, the motor will be spinning for nothing, and eat up your packs in a hurry. Reason 3 is the fact that 5s is taller than 4s. You want the lowest center of gravity for the best handling.

i just got done running at a huge track today running 4-5s, 4s on the tekin 2250 truggy motor is about 40 mph with the epa all the way up, speedo 140 motor 140 after 5 min quallifiers, put in a 5s and turned the epa down to 90 from 125 for 5s, after 15 mins, speedo 150, motor 150, i do not believe that turning the epa down affects the temp that much:whistle: is this agreed by my temps?

johnnychaos 07.05.2009 08:37 PM

i dont race.... i bash, but my friends that race all prefer 4s

speedy 07.06.2009 11:39 AM

I forgot to say that i race on a grasstrack !!! Does that change anything ?
Grass pull more amp's right ? and what about 15/46 gearing ?

Mentat 07.06.2009 03:57 PM

i want to chime in here. I have an 8ight-t 1.0 converted to Electric using CC Monster Mamba 2200kv combo and i have both 4s and 5s. 4s is way better on the track. Its the only time i run the car is on the track. Im getting 25mins outta my 4s 5000mAh 20c/25c packs. I get about the same on the 5s. 4s +++++ 5s is way hot, but runnable. 48t/15t gearing with the 4s packs no prbs

nitrostarter 07.06.2009 04:03 PM

4s is more than necessary.

5s, maybe for a big track with higher speeds and longer straights.

Turning down the EPA is non-sense. Set the car up right. Turning down the EPA is limit the ESC and thus making it always have to work hard to know the motor timing and when to send power. Where as, when you have the ability, the ESc is now capable of working less, or "thinking" less and should therefore run cooler.

BrianG 07.06.2009 04:05 PM

I still think that 5s geared down a little would be a better choice for bashing, especially on a grass track. And if he wants to gear up a little for some speed runs, it will be more than ready.

nitrostarter 07.06.2009 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianG (Post 302108)
I still think that 5s geared down a little would be a better choice for bashing, especially on a grass track. And if he wants to gear up a little for some speed runs, it will be more than ready.


Couldn't agree more for bashing.

For racing, 4s is plenty and even sheds a little weight from the lighter 4s pack. Lighter= less strain.

But I also have to fall back on Steve Neu's recommendations of his motors being design to be most efficient in the 30-35K rpm range.

BrianG 07.06.2009 04:12 PM

Yes, for racing, I agree; 4s. But he did say he's racing on a grass track. :wink:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.