RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   Brushless (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Current draw of a 3511KV 5407L with no load on 2s or 3s lipo? Need some help here. (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22357)

littlegiant 07.18.2009 08:40 AM

Current draw of a 3511KV 5407L with no load on 2s or 3s lipo? Need some help here.
 
Current draw of a 3511KV 5407L with no load on 2s or 3s lipo?

I suspect that my feigao has partiallly demagnetised. Right now i am having a current draw of 6A unloaded on 2S lipo. Is this normal?

hemiblas 07.18.2009 01:13 PM

That sounds pretty high. I will look later on and I think I have one of those laying around somewhere and a wattmeter. I will try to give a comparison, but usually its only 1 or 2 amps from what I have seen.

zeropointbug 07.18.2009 01:32 PM

My 7XL will draw 6.5 amps no load on 6s lipo... so it could be right. Maybe check Fiegao website for idle currents?

littlegiant 07.19.2009 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeropointbug (Post 305547)
My 7XL will draw 6.5 amps no load on 6s lipo... so it could be right. Maybe check Fiegao website for idle currents?

Hi, thanks alot for the info. I've tried searching on feigao website but all I have found is the max current spec of the 540 motors.

zeropointbug 07.19.2009 12:19 AM

No prod bob.
It's probably right... Fiegaos aren't exactly made with high quality control, so everyone's results may vary a bit.

littlegiant 07.19.2009 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeropointbug (Post 305652)
No prod bob.
It's probably right... Fiegaos aren't exactly made with high quality control, so everyone's results may vary a bit.

I've tested the rest of my motors and found that motors with stator has a lower idle current. Motors without stator cores but have very strong magnets have higher idle current. Higher KV = higher idle current.

Well it all makes sense now. :D

All tested are 2 poles motors.

J57ltr 07.19.2009 12:34 PM

I don't understand your last post, a stator is the stationary portion of the magnetic field. Basically its the windings in the motor. So as I like to tell people who walk up to me and start speaking spanish: "No Nintendo."

Jeff

littlegiant 07.19.2009 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J57ltr (Post 305698)
I don't understand your last post, a stator is the stationary portion of the magnetic field. Basically its the windings in the motor. So as I like to tell people who walk up to me and start speaking spanish: "No Nintendo."

Jeff

My mistake. I left out one word. Stator coil and stator core. Some brushless motors do not have stator cores (aka air cores) to concentrate the magnetic field. u aren't totally right either. :D Good day.

J57ltr 07.19.2009 01:05 PM

I was just trying to be funny. How am I not right? The stator is the stationary part of a brushless motor. It's also the stationary coils of an alternator or generator, or any motor type that uses a winding that is stationary position usually on the outside of the rotor or armature as the case may be. In an outrunner it's still the stationary portion of the motor.
I guess if you go by a wikipedia definition or something then I could be wrong. I guess you are referring to slotted vs slotless? (idk I’m asking)

Jeff

littlegiant 07.19.2009 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J57ltr (Post 305702)
I was just trying to be funny. How am I not right? The stator is the stationary part of a brushless motor. It's also the stationary coils of an alternator or generator, or any motor type that uses a winding that is stationary position usually on the outside of the rotor or armature as the case may be. In an outrunner it's still the stationary portion of the motor.
I guess if you go by a wikipedia definition or something then I could be wrong. I guess you are referring to slotted vs slotless? (idk I’m asking)

Jeff

Oh my mistake again. That's the word I am looking for. Slotted!!! Thanks for bringing this up. Stators are usually made up of 2 parts the coil and the core. I have edited my post and meant to say stator core then. I didn't say that you were wrong just tat u only mentioned the coil and not the core. It was my mistake. Come on :lol: i made a mistake but it is not the end of the world. didn't u noticed that :D near the end of my post to you? :D:D:D:D

J57ltr 07.19.2009 01:49 PM

"No entiende" is spanish for "don't understand."

It's no big deal I was just missing what you were saying, I misunderstood what you were saying.

It would seem to me that a slotted motor would have a lower idle current than a non slotted motor (air core) due to having more inductance, thus more impedance (and lower Kv) than an aircore motor. Is this correct?

And how do you measure idle current? With the motor at a very low RPM without a load? What's the test procedure?

Jeff

littlegiant 07.19.2009 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J57ltr (Post 305713)
"No entiende" is spanish for "don't understand."

It's no big deal I was just missing what you were saying, I misunderstood what you were saying.

It would seem to me that a slotted motor would have a lower idle current than a non slotted motor (air core) due to having more inductance, thus more impedance (and lower Kv) than an aircore motor. Is this correct?

Jeff

That will be right. I am not sure about the part of the impedance though. :) The stator core concetrates the magnetic flux generated by the coil hence it takes less coil to produce the same power. But the savings in copper is offset by having a stator core.

J57ltr 07.19.2009 02:16 PM

All things being equal, having an iron core would do exactly as you say, but because of the iron core there would be a larger resistance to changes in current flow ie: inductance so that would lower the Kv and increase the impedance which changes with frequency (RPM).

"But the savings in copper is offset by having a stator coil."
And you meant to say core right?

I am not trying to nit pick , just understand.

Jeff

littlegiant 07.19.2009 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J57ltr (Post 305716)
All things being equal, having an iron core would do exactly as you say, but because of the iron core there would be a larger resistance to changes in current flow ie: inductance so that would lower the Kv and increase the impedance which changes with frequency (RPM).

"But the savings in copper is offset by having a stator coil."
And you meant to say core right?

I am not trying to nit pick , just understand.

Jeff

:lol:Yeah i meant to say core.

hemiblas 07.19.2009 04:42 PM

Sorry it took me so long. 3.4A on 2S, 5A on 3S.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.