![]() |
The new rumor floating around, is it true?
Brushless systems are happiest in the 140-160... Confirm/deny?
I thought it was the cooler the better/more efficient? |
I have no clue, but to add to your first statement. I think you meant to say that the more efficient motors run cooler.
I can imagine there are certain temperatures that may allow current to move through something a bit better. Then again I am no electrician. From a physics stand point, which I understand slightly better than electronics, I would say colder the better. The closer the molecules are together the less resistance. At least that makes some sense in my eyes. |
The first sentence;
Was the source of this info on the TRX forum ?? 140-160 is a "safe" operating temp but may not be exactly ideal. I've ben lead to believe that cooler is more efficent, heat is the enemy of anything electrical. |
Quote:
|
Absolute zero would be nice to reduce losses...
|
Lipos perform better when they are warmer, but I cant imagine the same is true of a normal circuit- cooler the better for the esc and motor surely?..
|
It wasnt the trx forum, it was actually someone very respectable in rc that races on a national level. However I always heard the cooler the better when it comes to planes, boats, cars, ect.
|
Quote:
|
I always thought that heat = higher resistance in the windings = more power wasted. Isn't it a kind of cycle, like a certain motor is inefficient, so it produces more heat, the heat causes even more resistance, so it gets even hotter, and so on? I would imagine this happens to all motors to some degree, but certain designs are more efficient that others, reducing the overall effect.
I might take a hint from Arct1k and start dipping my motors in liquid nitrogen before each run. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.