RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   Brushless (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Maxwell Ultra-Cap's/Lithium cells hybrid pack (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4788)

zeropointbug 12.02.2006 11:49 PM

Maxwell Ultra-Cap's/Lithium cells hybrid pack
 
Hey guys, just here to talk about putting Maxwell ultra capacitors in with a 5s2p A123 pack. If you do not know the consequences of this setup, it would essentially reduce, or almost relieve voltage droop of a battery, and would take all the peak loading away from the battery. The cap. back would weight in at 480 grams and has a peak voltage of 20 volts at 38.75 farads, which equals to 5275 Joules of energy. This 'type' of power in combination with the battery discharge capability, the output power of this hybrid pack would be phenomenal. It would also get rid of erratic voltage fluctuations...

The voltage under hard acceleration would stay almost at nominal state (16.5v) and would have very, VERY flat discharge curve (that is bursting power). You would have to use 8 cells in series for 20 volts peak (2.5 volts/cell), capacity goes down by C/Sc

The specs for the cap is:

Capacity: 310 farads
Voltage: 2.5 volts
Current: 1500 amps
Length: 62mm
Diameter: 33mm


There is also smaller cells,

120 farads
140 farads
and a 350 farads capacitors

BrianG 12.03.2006 12:20 AM

It would be interesting to see how this works. I agree that it would all but eliminate the instantaneous voltage sag providing that the heavy current draw isn't continuous. I have a couple of questions though;

- What are the physical dimensions? If it is too big, it may have a hard time fitting in some already cramped areas.

- How do you charge them? A capacitor that size (even 500,00uF) should NOT be simply slapped on the batteries as the instaneous current would be all but infinite, only limited by the battery capacity. As a matter of fact, it would seem like a dead short until the cap charge level increased. Most of the time, large caps are charged via a series connected resistor. The time it would take to charge is 5*R*C. Whatever charging procedure is used must be used whenever a fresh set of batteries are installed.

In car audio, the general rule of thumb is to use 1F for every 500-1000watts (rms). Of course more is better, but there is a bang-for-the-buck aspect. I would think that 2-3F would be more than sufficient and be much smaller, lighter, and easier to install.

Also, there is an added benefit to the use of a cap; runtime may actually go up a little. Since there won't be large pulses of discharge current, the battery will actually deliver the full Ah rating of the battery.

zeropointbug 12.03.2006 01:22 AM

Yes, you are very correct in your notings. Thats the thing, with bashing the power duty is bursting.

First, the size is overall the same size as my 5s2p A123 pack, although the weight is a little over half the weight of the battery pack.

As for charging, i have my BK Precision power supply that can bring it up to the voltage of the pack at any current rate it set it at, it's completely programmable. (If i simply connected the M1 pack to the caps, the tabs would disappear ;) Then, i simply couple it in with the battery pack, and put a very short connector between it and the controller, ~.5 inch, and maybe shorten up the controller input lead length, to completely get rid of voltage spikes due to inductance/EMF.

I would be able to charge with the caps coupled to the pack.

And yes, i forgot to mention it, you would have longer runtime (if the small added weight would not offset) because of the Ah retention. Most likely longer cell life too, maybe not enough to justify the Cap's cost in the first place; but the caps are rated at 500,000 duty cycles. :)

Im thinking the smaller 120 farad caps would do the job too, and the bank would weight only 232 grams. Each cell is 51mm long, and 26mm diameter. This cap is rated at 500 amps.

I really think this would provide very high power levels, very, how do you say... like hooking up a 12V car battery up to your model. Let's say, very 'ROBUST PERFORMANCE'. I've always wanted to try this.

zeropointbug 12.03.2006 01:26 AM

Oh, BTW, Brian. How do you like the Spektrum radios, i have been wanting to get one of those for a while. Just would like to know how it feels?

BrianG 12.03.2006 02:08 AM

Believe me, I'm not trying to argue against using them, I'm just trying to see if there is a feasible way to use them.

That said, you said you can charge with your bench power supply at whatever current you set. OK, that's constant current mode. However batteries are constant voltage sources. So, if I charge the cap up and then install it in my R/C, great, all will work fine. But once the batts finally dump, the batts and the cap will have a lower voltage. So, you stick a new pack in there and connect them and BAM! Those poor Deans will have a nice black mark where the arc hit. I guess I'm thinking more in terms of Mr R/C Joe who just hooks stuff up and goes. I don't think he'll be bringing along a multi-thousand dollar P/S. :)

A way to get around this would be to permanently wire one of those caps to each pack. That way, they are charged at the same time and discharged at the same time, so there will never be a difference in potential. The only time you'll have to be careful is the initial hookup when you build the pack/cap combo.

This would certainly help battery life! All you would need is a battery that can supply the average current required by your setup since all spikes would be all but nonexistant!

Also, no more worries about max C, pulsed C, etc - only the constant draw would be the issue, which is quite low. For example, my Revo with 14XGP3300 cells gets about 13-14 minutes of runtime. I'm sure it pulls 100A bursts (or more), but the average draw is only ~14A. That means a lot more batteries can be used where they couldn't before due to their low max discharge performance, even though their capacity was great (like GP4300's).

Oh, and I like my Spektrum a lot. The receiver is small and fits anywhere. No glitches ever. I only wish the transmitter would have more model memories. If I had to do it over again, I'd get a Nomadio and still use the Spektrum receivers where small size is needed (the Nomadio receivers are kinda big IMO) simply because it can store more models.

zeropointbug 12.03.2006 02:24 AM

Yeah, i sooo want to try this. About the setup, ya if you have more than one pack, the deans connector would disappear if using A123 cells, and would be very dangerous using LiPo's. But, i only have one pack, that can be charged in 25 minutes ;) (the BK power supply is $330) So, for me i would have the pack and caps permanently hooked together, well not really, just a deans but they would never be disconnected.

So, would you know the duration of the 100+ amp bursts in a brushless setup like Quark and an XL motor? Just so i can do more calcs.

This would be a kick in the face for the motor! :)

zeropointbug 12.03.2006 02:28 AM

Also, the self discharge of the 120 farad cap is .15mA which is VERY low, no worries about it discharging the battery pack anytime soon...

BrianG 12.03.2006 02:46 AM

Yeah, if you are set up for that kind of thing and understand the possible risks if not done right, it should work great. Doesn't seem to be something that will be available for the masses anytime soon though.

The bursts doen't last very long; basically however long it takes for the motor to reach the rpm of the signal it's being fed, which is mostly on take-off out of the hole, and any hard acceleration. I'm sure there are a couple graphs of an EagleTree plot around here somewhere.

150uA delf discharge; not bad. According to my calculations, it would take about 3.5 years to totally drain a 4.6Ah pack not including the self-discharge of the battery itself.

MetalMan 12.03.2006 02:55 AM

All of the bursts I have recorded using my Eagle Tree MicroPower have been more of "spikes", where the high current point is maintained for something like 1/10th of a second, and the current tapers off on either side of the high point. The total burst might occur over a second or two, depending on how I use the throttle before and after the spike.

zeropointbug 12.03.2006 03:06 AM

Yah, so preferably getting the smallest pack possible to take care of the spikes and bursts. Enough to keep the voltage up at nominal.

However, even a small voltage 'difference' from nominal voltage would equate to large currents, again, like you said, a cap of this size is basically a short circuit...

So you say 1/10 th of a second eh? :) That sounds good then...

Do you think 2300 Joules is enough, that is a 8s 140 farad (17.5 F.) cap bank. @ 232 grams with 500 amp

Or the larger one at 480 grams, 8s 310 farad (38.75 F.) cap bank with 5300 Joules with 1500 amp

Serum 12.03.2006 03:37 AM

2300 joules enough?

a 5S 8000mA battery delivers a total of 532800 joules and at 50C there is 62000 joules of available energy per second. (at 3.1V per cell)

GriffinRU 12.03.2006 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeropointbug
Hey guys, just here to talk about putting Maxwell ultra capacitors in with a 5s2p A123 pack. If you do not know the consequences of this setup, it would essentially reduce, or almost relieve voltage droop of a battery, and would take all the peak loading away from the battery. The cap. back would weight in at 480 grams and has a peak voltage of 20 volts at 38.75 farads, which equals to 5275 Joules of energy. This 'type' of power in combination with the battery discharge capability, the output power of this hybrid pack would be phenomenal. It would also get rid of erratic voltage fluctuations...

The voltage under hard acceleration would stay almost at nominal state (16.5v) and would have very, VERY flat discharge curve (that is bursting power). You would have to use 8 cells in series for 20 volts peak (2.5 volts/cell), capacity goes down by C/Sc

The specs for the cap is:

Capacity: 310 farads
Voltage: 2.5 volts
Current: 1500 amps
Length: 62mm
Diameter: 33mm


There is also smaller cells,

120 farads
140 farads
and a 350 farads capacitors

I am in the process of testing 58F version... :)

D-cell to compare

Artur

Serum 12.03.2006 12:14 PM

What is your opinion on them?

Did you test them a bit yet? i see you shortened them, i pressume where empty.. ? :p

Serum 12.03.2006 12:23 PM

They seem to have a relative high internal resistance?

GriffinRU 12.03.2006 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serum
They seem to have a relative high internal resistance?

Not that bad, specs can be downloaded here

Quote:

What is your opinion on them?

Did you test them a bit yet? i see you shortened them, i pressume where empty.. ? :p
Very promising...
I was tracking them for long time and happy that you can get one. Hopefully later their would be wider selection.
In RC application lower internal resistance would be more important the capacitance, but power ratings should be still high.

Preliminary testing, shows regular capacitor behavior, but full-time testing bed is under construction. Stock E-Maxx-Hacker-MambaMaxx-12 cheap cells-eagletree...

Artur


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.