RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   Brushless (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Brushless E-maxx (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9349)

vertigo73 01.04.2008 05:52 PM

Brushless E-maxx
 
HELLO MY NAME IS MATTHIAS I M live in FRANCE (SAVOIE 73000 )
i would like to buy a motor brusless and esc but i dont kwon a modele for e-maxx and the solution for buy on rc monster and how many much the system and i m sorry i speak a little english !!!!!!
thank you and happy new years 2008

suicideneil 01.04.2008 06:05 PM

Which Emaxx, 3905(new one) or 3906(old one)?
What is your budget?
Try this for translating:

http://babelfish.altavista.com/

vertigo73 01.04.2008 06:17 PM

which e-maxx 3906
my budget is 250 euros / 328 dollars
spur 18t and / 66t

vertigo73 01.04.2008 06:21 PM

I possede a monster of origin and I want to put a brushless with controller to have a good speed, the problem C which I what I do not know needs and I would wish to buy on rc-monster, but I wanted its to see for conbien I would have some of order from France

t-maxxracer32 01.04.2008 06:36 PM

even though its not perfect english i think we all can basically understand most of it so dont feel bad!

for a 325 budget i would go with an 8xl feigao motor
http://www.rc-monster.com/proddetail...WAND_XL&cat=20

and then a quark 125B
http://www.rc-monster.com/proddetail...RK_125A&cat=21

that will make your budget only 35 dollars more and it will be a very nice setup.

phildogg 01.04.2008 06:42 PM

why the quark? I'd go with the mamba max esc and save alot..
phil

bluonyx 01.04.2008 06:46 PM

So will the newer MM's handle 4S with a Cap and fan added? I thought they wouldn't.

ilpufxit 01.04.2008 06:46 PM

Quark is better
 
I just finished trying a MM and then a Quark 80b on the same 8xl motor at 4s. The Quark is WAY smoother! Not even close.

t-maxxracer32 01.04.2008 06:50 PM

the newer mm escs cannot handle the voltages as better as the old ones (so ive heard) im not exactly sure what hes running as far as batteries go but since its an emaxx im guessing 4-5s lipos. or 12-16 cell nimh.

i was thinking right now about editing my post and putting in an 80b instead but again. im not sure how that would handle the higher voltages in a big truck.

phildogg 01.04.2008 07:10 PM

I'm pretty sure they handle 4s fine its the 14NiMH cells they won't take.
phil

A RC Dude 01.04.2008 07:24 PM

i've heard that as long as ur running a UBEC u'll be fine with the mambamax esc but i'm not 100% sure.

BlackedOutREVO 01.04.2008 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phildogg (Post 138503)
I'm pretty sure they handle 4s fine its the 14NiMH cells they won't take.
phil

The MM and the UBEC will do 4s, or 14 cells just fine:mdr:

bluonyx 01.04.2008 08:03 PM

I've had my MM's for over a year now and they run 4S w/UBEC just fine. I wanna get more but if the new ones can't run 4S w/UBEC anymore, I'll just wait for the MMM. (Man, that's a lota M's)

I'm afraid of the MGM because it seems everyone is frying them, or is that just because of 5S and everyone pushes them? I only bash so 4S is the max for me.

t-maxxracer32 01.04.2008 09:05 PM

everyones frying mgms?

i see more fried bks than mgms.

i think the mgms are very nice (my 16018 is awsome)

lincpimp 01.04.2008 09:35 PM

Seems like luck of the draw with esc purchases. I have 7 MM and 5 quarks and all of them have worked fine. I did nuke a MM but that was on 5s and a rock got stuck in the spur and stopped the motor dead at around 30 mph.

To me the new quark plasma looks to be the best bet. It combines the great quark smoothness and a decent looking design for heatsinking. If it performs as well as the 125b and stays cool we may have a winner. Especially if it can handle 6s and not cook itself!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.