![]() |
RPM arms
Anybody familiar with these?
http://www.rpmrcproducts.com/product...3.htm#trutrack Would they be stronger or weaker then the standard arms? |
No, but as soon as tower hobbies has them in stock I will be very familiar with them. I hate the stock rear toe link, and have bent many of them, so this is what i have been waiting for. I have used rpm arms on many vehicles and have been very happy with the quality and performance and am sure that these will be just as good!
|
I currently have RPM arms on a FLM chassis and FLM Hybrid bulk E-maxx. I am anticipating my next "weak link" which will probably be the arms or axle crriers at the pillow balls. I am hoping these will help.
Mark |
RPM makes good stuff. I would recommend them.
|
They are flexible as heck. with 3.3 shafts you should be fine.
|
rpm stuff is great and i will get those for my emaxx when i get some money thats for sure:yes:
|
I think they are a great idea. I always hated the rear turnbuckle. that was always the part I broke in a cartwheel. I think this is a slick idea. It would be better if they did it without the e-clips on the hingepins. E-clips suck and should be banished from RC:slap:
|
I've run the stock type rpm stuff on a lightweight (Slayden type) Tmaxx and they've taken everything I could dish out. Only thing - if the nylon formula hasn't changed, they're very flexible, especially on a hot day. Precision type cvds (UE) will get bent with this kind of setup.
I agree though, a 3.3 setup shouldn't have any probs. Only thing I hate worse than e-clips are those phillips headed wood screw things they call screws. |
It's about time they made these, just like the rear on the LST2's and Muggy's.
|
The idea is not new - the same thing was tried out a few years ago, but they never caught on and they disappeared. At least with rpm behind them, they'll be around for a while.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.