Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skellyo
Quote:
Originally Posted by teamtekin
Since it appears you will tear it apart and look anyway maybe I should tell you what our fet is? I think the spec sheet will impress you. Far better than what you are looking at currently for large scale applications.
Again in reference to comparing their FET's to the MM FET's:
Quote:
Originally Posted by teamtekin
Need to protect ourselves a little. The others will find this fet also I am sure. I will tell you the continuous drain current is higher, Rds on is lower, gate charge is lower and pulse current is unbelievable. Try over 250A vs 106A. Spendy little buggers however.
|
Missed that little gem RE: Fet specs. :) Thanks to Brian for forcing the hand! Does that suggest the Pro ESC
could be rated for 200A+ then (depending on the other components)?
Would explain the price diff on the R1 pro vs MM. Makes you wonder what the Pro could do itself, as the doubling of the Fets from the r1 to the Pro is suggested to be enough for the MT. Again, pushing 6S seems very possible on man brakes. Theoretically perhaps on the MM if the current could be kept low enough, as discounting other components like caps (ie not in real world in other words. I'll have to flip back to the MM fet thread on this.)
Its also going to be interesting to see how the market breaks for the ESCs. CC is aiming for the low end, while the Tekin will be higher end. Its going to be hard competition vs a low cost competitor, so long as both are going to be capable enough. Look @ walmart for example, low cost but lower quality (not that I would call the MM low quality in and absolute sense.)