Quote:
Originally Posted by lutach
Explain something to me. I ran the MGM 8012 which has no heatsink with the same set up I ran the MM and the MM thermaled a few times and the MGM didn't. Yes, it might be better software coming out of the MGM, but it has a rating that is 20A less then the MM and no heatsink. If someone is on a budget, then yes go with the Feigao and MM. I just wanted to help out in pointing a good efficient sytem.
|
Well, what kinfd of amp draw do you think your setup was pulling. I know that the mm is designed to spin a 2 pole motor, maybe that is what its rating refers to. Using a higher pole count motor seems to load the esc more, and may lower its ratings to suit. I feel it has alot to do with the programming. Quark and mgm got it right, for many different motors, while cc may have only tested their 2 pole motors (feigao-style) with it. I am sure that the meg/mgm setup would be alot better than the mm/feigao setup. But it is also nearly twice the price, which is revracers issue at the moment. I think it is good to start with a cheaper system to get used to brushless, and then graduate to a better system. That way if you destroy something due to assembly error it is cheaper. I still run feigao motors, but have gone to lower kv motors on more voltage, which the cheap motors seem to be more tolerant of. I guess that the lower amp draw thru the motor masks the ineffeceintcy of the feigao.