|
01.29.2008, 06:19 PM
Not if it uses client-side code. My site does have the option for server-side scripts (MySQL/PHP/etc) but any change the user make would require trips to the server and have the web server write out the final output. I find performance to be much better to have everything downloaded to the client and use scripts to change any active content. The largest file I use in all pages, library.js, is only 50kB, so client-based code works fine and would almost be a waste of time to make it query a database like this site does.
The most I could do is use a form of encryption scheme, but that is fairly easy to crack. It would only keep the honest thieves honest. It also makes updating the pages a PITA because I'd have to unencode it, make changes, and reencode it. Blah.
|