RC-Monster Forums - View Single Post

RC-Monster Mike · 09.03.2005, 09:23 PM

The MGM 16016 would handle the 1930 motor pretty easily, actually. I have sent an e-mail to MGM for you, Travis, but haven't yet gotten a reply. I will call them Monday to follow up. :)
As I said, I prefer the BK controllers, mostly due to driving them for years and being used to the way the software works. The quirky thing about the MGM is that if you are driving forward and hit the brakes, it works perfectly, but if you go back to neutral and hit the brakes again-REVERSE is engaged! This caused me a couple endos before I realized what was happening. Awareness would(and will) of course prevent this mishap in the future. The MGM can also handle 4 pole motors better and has a higher rpm capability(150k vs. 100k with 2 pole motors), along with a Lipo cutoff.

	(#38)
RC-Monster Mike Site Owner Offline Posts: 4,915 Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: PA	09.03.2005, 09:23 PM The MGM 16016 would handle the 1930 motor pretty easily, actually. I have sent an e-mail to MGM for you, Travis, but haven't yet gotten a reply. I will call them Monday to follow up. :) As I said, I prefer the BK controllers, mostly due to driving them for years and being used to the way the software works. The quirky thing about the MGM is that if you are driving forward and hit the brakes, it works perfectly, but if you go back to neutral and hit the brakes again-REVERSE is engaged! This caused me a couple endos before I realized what was happening. Awareness would(and will) of course prevent this mishap in the future. The MGM can also handle 4 pole motors better and has a higher rpm capability(150k vs. 100k with 2 pole motors), along with a Lipo cutoff.