RC-Monster Forums - View Single Post

Arct1k · 09.08.2008, 04:00 PM

The CC solution has mixed merits - It is perfect for a dual battery setup on 4s which I guess is why the built a 4s buggy motor 1650 1512 1Y. There is a lot of room on the chassis either in the back left or front right - I think you could probably fit everything on the deck.

Not suitable for single pack layouts - Pushes the battery out to the sides which may impact handling and could expose them to some knocks. I hope they are held on by more than 3 screws.

I know it looks a bit like the Hyper RCP design - however nice to see something a bit different - i.e. not being afraid to move the servo.

I will be watching this as I have an x1cr that I would like to run twin packs on and this pod design might actually still fit with an rcm motor mount...

	(#26)
Arct1k RC-Monster Mod Offline Posts: 6,597 Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: NJ	09.08.2008, 04:00 PM The CC solution has mixed merits - It is perfect for a dual battery setup on 4s which I guess is why the built a 4s buggy motor 1650 1512 1Y. There is a lot of room on the chassis either in the back left or front right - I think you could probably fit everything on the deck. Not suitable for single pack layouts - Pushes the battery out to the sides which may impact handling and could expose them to some knocks. I hope they are held on by more than 3 screws. I know it looks a bit like the Hyper RCP design - however nice to see something a bit different - i.e. not being afraid to move the servo. I will be watching this as I have an x1cr that I would like to run twin packs on and this pod design might actually still fit with an rcm motor mount...