View Single Post
Old
  (#2)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
09.16.2009, 01:31 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by simplechamp View Post
I've watched both the original and the addendum. I take it all with a grain of salt. There are some valid points, and also many bogus ones. I really don't care about the movie either way. It is what it is. That's fine. Believe what you want, I'll believe what I want.

What I dislike is when people criticize me for not thinking it's the most eye-opening, life-changing movie ever. It's a movie that asks you to question the entire fabric of society. Yet it's been my experience that when I even slightly question the validity of this movie supporters get very defensive and all of a sudden I'm a "sheep".

So questioning society as a whole = good but questioning a movie made by one guy with a biased viewpoint and questionable "facts" = bad. Makes perfect sense.

http://www.conspiracyscience.com/articles/zeitgeist/

I have read most of that website already, I checked it out again for Addendum, a handful of good points he makes, but mostly regurgitates the same old propaganda the movie disproves (I would take that website with a grain of salt).

Another reason I wouldn't listen to a word he says, just look at all the advertisements on his website!!! lol I didn't even notice at first! Google ads, Scientology ads, diamond ads. That there is dangerous.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote