[zeropointbug]

Originally Posted by Finnster

With all due respect man, I don't think you have the expertise to say that. Its your opinion that it doesn't seem like the buildings should have fallen like that, but that has little bearing on the actual truth of the matter.

I can't wrap my head around parts of Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, and how going faster slows the passage of time. That does not mean its not true.

This is Newtonian physics were are dealing with here man. Sry, but that is a bad analogy.

Anyway, my post was more aimed at the OP. But as an example of my point as you were the (un)fortunate one to respond. If it was Silverstein's master plan, how did he get a hold of hundreds of thousands of pounds of explosives, get people to secretly rig them in his building (which 50000 people worked in, and hundreds of tourists visited every day) manage to hijack to 4 separate planes, all the while not getting caught and having enough money left over after the payoffs and materials to make the mass murder worth it? As far as insurance scams go, seems a bit complicated. Really, why bother bombing the pentagon then? One more chance to get caught, and get set on fire and shoved thru a woodchipper by an angry mob.

No one said Larry Silverstein was the "master planner". Again, you are asking questions out of the scope of this thread, and are quite frankly, redundant.

When looking at the implications and totality of these theories, it just doesn't make any sense.

So, what makes sense to you about the official theory then? The lies that the government has told you about the terrorists that ended being ALIVE, then they don't care about who did it after they started the war.... or the WMD's that didn't exist after they started the war?