RC-Monster Forums - View Single Post

VintageMA · 04.28.2010, 09:06 AM

nuz69 - I don't agree with your arguements.

- Both motors are 1512 motors and will weigh the same.
- Neu motor are actually more efficient up around the 40K range. It is the cheaper motors which are more efficient in the lower RPM ranges primarily because they are, well, cheaper.

Listen to what Jeff is saying - he knows his stuff.

IMO if you use the 1850kv motor you should really be going up to 5S to bring the RPMs closer to 35K. If you go with the 1850kv motor with 4S and taller gearing you are going to pull many more amps on acceleration than you would with the 2650 with shorter gearing. The 2650 motor will just have an easier time spooling up.

I would say run the 2650 with 20-30% punch and you'll be pretty happy.

	(#8)
VintageMA RC-Monster Aluminum Offline Posts: 660 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: CT	04.28.2010, 09:06 AM nuz69 - I don't agree with your arguements. - Both motors are 1512 motors and will weigh the same. - Neu motor are actually more efficient up around the 40K range. It is the cheaper motors which are more efficient in the lower RPM ranges primarily because they are, well, cheaper. Listen to what Jeff is saying - he knows his stuff. IMO if you use the 1850kv motor you should really be going up to 5S to bring the RPMs closer to 35K. If you go with the 1850kv motor with 4S and taller gearing you are going to pull many more amps on acceleration than you would with the 2650 with shorter gearing. The 2650 motor will just have an easier time spooling up. I would say run the 2650 with 20-30% punch and you'll be pretty happy. “Everyone has a right to be stupid; some people just abuse the privilege.”