|
Argument -
08.21.2011, 06:48 AM
Your arguement is a good one, and your reasoning is somewhat sound to the average homeowner who has not faced an insurance company face to face in this situation. The problem is that what your saying has been tested and the insurance companies that we face in these disagreements are some of the most profitable businesses in the world who have more money than any of us will ever see in our lives. The insurance game is one of the biggest, richest, lawyer savvy businesses in the world and they can make almost any lawyer look like a fool in the court system.
I did not post this information up for entertainment value or to get into a fight about how to beat the insurance comapny. I provided this insurance arguement as a warning from experience seeing people lose everything plus having their insurance company refuse payment of said claim due to a fire that was deemed caused by modified electronics being used for charging batteries in the home. A fire inspector invetigates home fires to determine what caused the fire and that determination will stand up in a court of law as fact in most cases. The insurance company can and will use that report as a means to pay or refuse personal insurance claims whether you agree with it or not.
The MA charger made from using two server PSU's in someones home garage does not equate to a professionally made electronic unit backed by solid engineering design for charging Lithium batteries, which are already considered a very dangerous endevour. It is still a home made piece of electronic gear configured from two used computer PSU's that were meant for powering just that, and not charging batteries. If you plan to use MA reputation as a justification in a court of law when we all know what a sham MA is professionally with their false advertising and poor quality Lipo packs, you are in for a world of hurt. Good luck with that.
|