This guy is my new hero

[brushlessboy16]

He's a badass!!!

http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/news...bear-arms.html

[BL_RV0]

Freakin' cool. Need I say more?

[nitrostarter]

When there's a will, there's a way!

[lincpimp]

I love how he has to have a "firearms id", I do not remember the constitution mentioning that in the 2nd amendment...

Not sure if it really matters if he has a gun or not, he will not be able to get it out of the safe easily (or at all)... At least someone is fighting for their rights, I am just waiting for the day ammo is banned. Have all the guns you like, just nothing to shoot out of them. Or maybe have a ammo license, kinda like a fishing license, but you can only buy 1 round a day or some crap like that. Watch out for big brother guys, he is watching, and wants you to step in line with the rest of the sheep (democrats).

But the whole country will be safer without the citizens having guns, just like Germany was in the early 1940s, and just like Australia is now... No need for the population to be able to fight back against the gov't, why would we want to do that, we have plenty of freedom... And guns kill so many people, all of them necessary too, we would not want to run out of people, god forbid...

[magman]

Glad to see some judge still believe in the 2nd amendment. The court system needs to stop being such wimps and start worrying about what is best for this country, NOT what is politically correct

[nitrostarter]

James, sound like you got a case of the RED ass just like most of the Intelligent Americans that are RIGHT. I mean who would ever think we have enough freedoms? or have the will/want to oppose the government?

[rabosi]

Originally Posted by lincpimp

........ he is watching, and wants you to step in line with the rest of the sheep (democrats)....

Kinda like how religious nuts want others to step in line (republicans). It doesn't matter if you are right wing, left wing, right foot, left foot, head or an ass, they all want you to stand in one line or the other. We just don't complain about the lines we like.

[Finnster]

Oh god, why did you post this up? Last thing we need to do is give Harold ideas

Originally Posted by rabosi

Kinda like how religious nuts want others to step in line (republicans). It doesn't matter if you are right wing, left wing, right foot, left foot, head or an ass, they all want you to stand in one line or the other. We just don't complain about the lines we like.

That thar be true. The far left wants to ban guns, the far right wants to ban dildos, porn and backdoor action.


Whatever, neither is happening anytime soon. Most avg people on both sides likes all that stuff way too much to ever get behind a ban. How many mass shootings have we had since the Dems took Congress in 2006? Anyone remember VT? They didn't do shit after that one. Hell, there was guys over the summer gunning down cops w/ automatic weapons and the Dems/Obama haven't said jackshit about even reinstating the Assualt Weapons Ban.

Those fights were over in the 90's man. They may flare up in certain pockets of the country or with certain politicians, but the national leadership runs away from any such talk.
Go ahead and stock up on ammo tho. The economy needs as much consumer spending as it can get. Maybe some clever banker can write a derviative against it in a few years and you can get some money back. All we need is another bubble to get us back on our feet again.

That is so cool, good for him.

I second pimps comment I don't recall our founding fathers requiring us to get a permit to own a gun in the second amendment.

But what do I know I live in Virginia and we are responsible for all of the gun crime in NYC.

[lincpimp]

Originally Posted by nitrostarter

James, sound like you got a case of the RED ass just like most of the Intelligent Americans that are RIGHT. I mean who would ever think we have enough freedoms? or have the will/want to oppose the government?

Heh, I just know that I will eventually stand alone. I guess that is cool, especially when the sissy boys come crying for my help and all I can offer is one finger and some lead.

Originally Posted by rabosi

Kinda like how religious nuts want others to step in line (republicans). It doesn't matter if you are right wing, left wing, right foot, left foot, head or an ass, they all want you to stand in one line or the other. We just don't complain about the lines we like.

Sheep are sheep, I was just referring to a certain type of sheep. Yes everyone wants to be the boss. I am not a republican any more than I am a democrat. I agree with the gun rights side on principle, not cause I like republicans. I am also not religious, and find any sort of political correct-ness disgusting. Hiding behind your "god" is also really disgusting to me as well. I you want to do something, do it for yourself.

Yes, for lack of a better term I am an elitist, and the rest of you are just not up to my standards. It is lonely at the top, but someone has to be here as an example for the few that strive (and fail) to be better. You may now proceed to discuss my "superiority complex"... It will not be the first time.

Originally Posted by 76Bentley

I second pimps comment I don't recall our founding fathers requiring us to get a permit to own a gun in the second amendment.

But what do I know I live in Virginia and we are responsible for all of the gun crime in NYC.

Hell, I bet you guys are responsible for all gun crime, everywhere. If we could just burn everything in virginia we would be just fine, right?

That last comment makes about as much sense as banning guns. When there are no guns we will go back to blunt objects, and when they ban everything we can use as a weapon the strongest man will be the most feared. Then the weaker will band together in gangs to beat up on the stronger individuals. Then we will have to ban people from congregating, as that will be viewed as gang-like. Where does it end, and more importantly, where does it start... It has started, make no mistake, and I do not like where it will go...

James,
You know I was referring to Micheal Bloomberg's assertion that the guns sold in Virginia at gun shows are causing the crime in NYC. He even sent someone to The Commonwealth to talk about changing our laws to make it harder to buy guns.
I was just being sarcastic, which doesn't do well on line so sorry I wasn't more specific.

And you hit the nail on the head. You can ban guns from the law abiding people and 1) criminals will still have them, you can ask the Brits. 2) people will find other ways to do each other in.

I am always confused by gun control people, they always know the stats on how many people are hurt/killed by gun violence, but they never know how many of those guns were illegally obtained or how many people are saved by legally owning and using a gun to defend themselves. Brock Lessnar the UFC Heavy Weight Champ is no match for a 90 pound woman that has and can use a Glock 9mm.

It is also surprising that if someone uses a gun to commit a crime they want to restrict guns, but if a person uses a hammer or screw driver (both of which are common tools for people that perform home invasions) they don't feel the same way. A gun is a tool, nothing more,nothing less and with all tools if you use them wrong or carelessly someone can get hurt or killed.

And yes people will and have always found new ways to inflict harm, in fact the yo-yo was originally a primitive hunting weapon. The hunters would sit up in a tree and try to drop what is essentially a big yo-yo (12-13lbs. I think was the weight I read they used) on there pray and if they missed they could simply pull the yo-yo back up to their position.

[lincpimp]

Originally Posted by 76Bentley

James,
You know I was referring to Micheal Bloomberg's assertion that the guns sold in Virginia at gun shows are causing the crime in NYC. He even sent someone to The Commonwealth to talk about changing our laws to make it harder to buy guns.
I was just being sarcastic, which doesn't do well on line so sorry I wasn't more specific.

And you hit the nail on the head. You can ban guns from the law abiding people and 1) criminals will still have them, you can ask the Brits. 2) people will find other ways to do each other in.

I am always confused by gun control people, they always know the stats on how many people are hurt/killed by gun violence, but they never know how many of those guns were illegally obtained or how many people are saved by legally owning and using a gun to defend themselves. Brock Lessnar the UFC Heavy Weight Champ is no match for a 90 pound woman that has and can use a Glock 9mm.

It is also surprising that if someone uses a gun to commit a crime they want to restrict guns, but if a person uses a hammer or screw driver (both of which are common tools for people that perform home invasions) they don't feel the same way. A gun is a tool, nothing more,nothing less and with all tools if you use them wrong or carelessly someone can get hurt or killed.

And yes people will and have always found new ways to inflict harm, in fact the yo-yo was originally a primitive hunting weapon. The hunters would sit up in a tree and try to drop what is essentially a big yo-yo (12-13lbs. I think was the weight I read they used) on there pray and if they missed they could simply pull the yo-yo back up to their position.

I got your sarcasm, and replied with some of my own!

Yes, the gun control people are just a bunch of near sighted morons. Yes, guns are easy to use (your 90 lb woman comment proves this) and they do give a criminal the upper hand. I do agree that getting guns out of criminals hands is a great idea. But trying to accomplish this goal (this IS the stated goal of all gun control) by limiting the rights of the rest of us law abiding people is not the way to go. It is difficult, making laws to try to curb the actions of those that do not follow laws is next to impossible. The way I see it, if everyone was armed the criminals would feel less like they had the upper hand and would most likely move on to something else. The old saying "an armed society is a polite society" certainly rings true to me. I consider my guns to be my "insurance" as no one is covering my ass but me. Plus they go up in value and are generally easy to sell (especially to criminals, J/K).

And from what I have heard the brits have some sort of laws against hammers being used in violent crime... Why litigate against specific items? You can only make laws against behaviors...

I still think my weekly Serin (sp?) gas injections into federal prisons would be deterant enough for people to no commit crimes... And more enforced death penalties (on the spot, judge dread style even...). We need to go back to the old west days. You packed a gun, and used it if you got in a fight. Someone won, and everyone else just went about their business. So you only got into a fight if you considered it worth your life, or you were a dumbass. Natural selection at its best, IMO.

[shaunjohnson]

guns suck

[lincpimp]

Originally Posted by shaunjohnson

guns suck

Did someone shoot you?

[_paralyzed_]

they don't even let me have safety scissors