|
08.07.2006, 11:23 PM
IMO, a recommendation for the Quark is based on two things:
- Only if you plan on running 5s or lower (or NiMH cell equivalent). Some work fine at 6s, some don't. Personally, just run it at 5s to be safe. Is this ideal since it is rated for 6s? Of course not - but complaining here won't change it; call the manufacturer.
- Only if you plan on adding a heatsink to the back. The metal cases simply are not big enough to dissipate the power. If running at 5s battery voltage with 100A of current, that is over 90 watts of power dissipated on the ESC assuming a very generous 95% efficiency. Of course not too many applications will draw that current continuously, but still.
If these two conditions can be met, then the nice programming options and silky smooth operation is a definite no-brainer. Not to mention a durable and easy mounting case design.
I think the problem with designing a bulletproof ESC is in part due to size contraints. Most people want an ESC with a tiny footprint, durable case, can be mounted easily, numerous programming options, high current handling, high voltage handling, won't burn up, and so on. It's tough to get all that in a small enough case to satisfy everyone at a price that won't break the bank. I'm sure the ideal ESC can be designed to fit everyone's needs, but I can bet it will be prohibitively expensive!
|