RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Questions and Answers > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
working with titanium ??
Old
  (#1)
Dafni
RC-Monster Mod
 
Dafni's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,487
Join Date: Feb 2005
working with titanium ?? - 02.18.2006, 09:17 AM

How is titanium to work on?
Easy to drill? Cut threads? On a lathe?
Special tools required?

Anybody some experience on this?

Thank you in advanve.
DAF
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
easy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
02.18.2006, 09:40 AM

titanium itself is rather a soft metal, it can catch fire while machining. When in a alloy, the alloy becomes very strong, and hard to cut, difficult to work with. The alloy 6AL-4V is very common I used to have many parts machined with this alloy and it took several months to perfect our run times, speed and tooling, nice stuff, just not for every one to work with
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
maxxdude1234
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
maxxdude1234's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 675
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
02.18.2006, 10:27 AM

Diamond tipped tools are a must with titanium alloys, tungsten carbide will last no time at all. I think you will also struggle to drill through it with normal drill bits (High speed steel). Don't know much else about it, but my school workshop don't manufacture anything out of titanium, cos its too tough.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Serum
RC-Monster Admin
 
Serum's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
02.18.2006, 10:39 AM

Titanium is a PITA to work on..

I've got some titanium rods, but it's so darn tough.. with a simple rasp, it's almost impossible to get some off. you need a high speed dremel to machine it a bit.

You need a drill press to make holes in it, it's a disaster, no wonder titanium parts are that expensive

Last edited by Serum; 02.18.2006 at 10:43 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
easy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
02.18.2006, 11:11 AM

Titanium really isn't needed in a RC application high quality aluminum is strong enough and much cheaper and easier to work with. Titan parts are more for bling factor We have had as many failures with titanium components as with aluminum and the weight factor is not much different.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Gustav
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Gustav's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 916
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
02.20.2006, 12:19 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by easy
Titanium really isn't needed in a RC application high quality aluminum is strong enough and much cheaper and easier to work with. Titan parts are more for bling factor We have had as many failures with titanium components as with aluminum and the weight factor is not much different.
I don't agree that Ti is for bling with RC vehicles.It is not used in place of aluminium in any RC application i can think of other than plates(apart from the cast Ti arms which are many many times stronger than anything you can make in aluminium)It's properties are nothing like aluminium and are far more like a lighter super steel,and that's where it mainly applies to RC, replacing steel parts with a lighter alternative.I don't think i'll be changing from lunsford,hardcore,flextek parts to aluminium anytime soon,i perfer to combine plastics and titanium to build the most durable chassis capable of absorbing large amounts of shock.Aluminium is ideal for when stiffness and lightweight is needed but is not a durable material.
Apart from being the most respected material in engineering,all the best machines are made from titanium,the shuttle,concorde,blackbird.Can't think of any aluminium parts on F1 cars either off the top of my head,carbon,magnesium,titanium being the materials of choice.

There i feel better now.

Last edited by Gustav; 02.20.2006 at 12:20 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
maxxdude1234
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
maxxdude1234's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 675
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
02.20.2006, 05:53 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
Apart from being the most respected material in engineering,all the best machines are made from titanium,the shuttle,concorde,blackbird.Can't think of any aluminium parts on F1 cars either off the top of my head,carbon,magnesium,titanium being the materials of choice.
Gustav, I'm sorry but I have to disagree with you there. Aluminium is widely used in all sorts of planes, including the most modern fighter jets. I can't believe your trying to claim that not one piece of aluminium was used on Concorde -that's argueably one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Aluminium is an extremely vital material in the world of engineering - used FAR more extensively than titanium.
Aluminium has been kicking around for so long, engineers know so much about it that nowadays, and rather than using it as a pure metal they can combine it with carbon fibre and complex plastics (skins of planes). Aluminium and carbon fibre are used extensively in F1 car engines, and also in the chassis.
I agree with you about titanium being a very respected material in the world of engineering, but to pass off aluminium like you did is not correct. Aluminium is the most common ore in the earths crust so whether we like it or not it is here to stay, and as time goes on we will discover more and more that can be done with it.

Hope I didn't cause too much of a disturbance! :)

Last edited by maxxdude1234; 02.20.2006 at 05:54 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Gustav
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Gustav's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 916
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
02.21.2006, 05:28 AM

EEr,i was saying no such thing.I can see how my use of the word 'either' in that sentence mislead you.(sorry for that but simply not what i meant to imply).I was not saying that those machines do not use any aluminium at all, and the only one of those machines i said i can't think of any use of Aluminium in, is an F1 car, and i can't.(Not in aircraft alloy form anyway,which was the comparison being made-not meaning the element is not present in other alloys-Ti alloys have Al in them for example),they use magnesium alloys for the block,uprights,wheels etc.I certainly was not claiming that not one piece of aluminium was used on concorde.

I was not trying to pass off the use of aluminium at all, i was merely objecting to the use of titanium in RC being branded unneccessary and mainly for bling,just because someone can't be bothered.Of course we all use and rely on aluminium,it's practical and easy to work with,light and stiff.If anything i was trying to seperate the comparison between the two,as there properties are not at all similar,used in different applications to aluminium as a lighter alternative to steel.(read my entire post)

The 'all the best machines' comment was meant to imply that when people want to build a special machine,such as Dafni seems to be thinking of one of the best trucks out there,then inevitably we will look to select the most ideal material in each area.My point was and still is, that aluminium is not always the most ideal and Ti is far from unnesessary.

Peace.

Last edited by Gustav; 02.21.2006 at 05:57 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Gustav
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Gustav's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 916
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
02.21.2006, 06:31 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by maxxdude1234
I can't believe your trying to claim that not one piece of aluminium was used on Concorde -that's argueably one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.
I simply never said that!

You are quite right to say Al based alloys are widely used in F1 engines (but i doubt there's any HE30,7075 etc that we use).The materials are governed by the sports regulations,not something NASA have to deal with.

This is interesting,http://www.newsonf1.com/f1regs/2006f1materials.htm It's the 2006 regulations for engine materials.Not as simple as saying Al this or Mg that.

Last edited by Gustav; 02.21.2006 at 07:42 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Serum
RC-Monster Admin
 
Serum's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
02.18.2006, 11:27 AM

for skids titanium is superior to aluminum.

titanium is not for the bling, it's more about the strength. what makes you say that aluminium and titanium weight/strength factor is about the same?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
maxxdude1234
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
maxxdude1234's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 675
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
02.18.2006, 11:52 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serum
what makes you say that aluminium and titanium weight/strength factor is about the same?
They are pretty similar. Aluminium is about half the weight of titanium, and 7000 series aluminium alloys are pretty strong. Titanium is better for skids (as you said), its much much harder and can absorb impacts. Aluminium is better for structural parts (bulkheads) as its much lighter.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
HotnCold
RC-Monster Admin
 
HotnCold's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,065
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: RC-Monster Store....Where else?
02.18.2006, 12:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serum
for skids titanium is superior to aluminum.

titanium is not for the bling, it's more about the strength. what makes you say that aluminium and titanium weight/strength factor is about the same?
Ti skids - Now that i would be interested in - I found a local guy that says he has a friend that is in joint replacement and has a bunch of titanium that i could get - Now if i could figure out how to incorporate or transforn a titanium knuckle used for human beings into a knuckle for my Gmaxx - id be all set...:027:


Hows that "Hope and Change" working out for Ya???
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
starscream
RC-Monster TQ
 
starscream's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 703
Join Date: Mar 2005
02.18.2006, 03:02 PM

What parts do you have in mind exactly?
Serum is right, ti is a PITA to work with. I needed to remove some material from my hardcore revo skid, for my center diff spur, and it was very difficult to drill/dremel etc. I was able to do it with regular drill bits but it was definetly a PITA to only remove just a little bit of material. :026:


Ha Ha
The Flashlight Strikes Again...
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
easy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
02.18.2006, 03:51 PM

Having had componentry manufactured in both 7000 series aluminum and 6AL-4V the strength is very similiar in smaller parts our engineers never understood why we had to have our components fabricated in Titan, except for the fact that the general public liked the thought that it was somehow far superior, and it is superior in many aspects. It is a personal choice myself I wouldn't try and manufacture my own custom parts with it.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Serum
RC-Monster Admin
 
Serum's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
02.18.2006, 05:58 PM

High tech engineering;

who said titanium was hard to work with.. it just takes the appropriate tools.. lol

   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com