Quote:
Originally Posted by bigsteel
I don't see that working,to many easily accessible roofs to utilize before putting solar panels on roads. Im trying to convince my mom to have some installed before I enlist. They pay for themselves in about 3 years,so I see no reason why people haven't done it already,and I'm by far no tree hugger but why WOULDN'T you want to end you electric bill? And it's not like the stuff isn't getting cheaper every day,there's already solar PAINT and solar chips that are printed and cost very little,so well just have to see what happens after gas hits 20$ a gallon and the energy crisis REALLY heats up.
|
Everything I have read says that it takes about 17yrs for solar panels to pay for themselves. Unless you are factoring in some sort of stimulus that is not avaialbe in my area. Plus there is going to be maintanence on these panels, what will that cost?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG
I think it would be simpler/cheaper to just improve the output and efficiency of current solar technology and overlay it all over a vehicle's exterior panels...
|
Trying to make my life more difficult Brian? It is already hard enough to fix banged up cars... Having my dumb employes electrocuting themsleves would put me over the edge!!!
Nothing against solar, but battery tech is not good enough yet. Cost of mfg and disposal of batteries is too high, and the cycle life is way too low. Enviormental impact of disposal is great, and perfoemance is still very poor. Solar does not work at night either, so the equipment is not working close to half of the time. It takes up alot of space and requires inverters and battery managment systems to function, adding to the repair complexity.
Nuclear is the way to go, pity big oil put a stop to that. You could have a small reactor in each town and not have to worry about tranmission losses and enviormental impact. New areas could get rid of overhead wires (what a dumb idea) at the same time and make the place look better.