Not responding to anyone's post in particular, I was thinking about the seemingly continual controversy about the death of batteries using the MMM. These are the facts as I know them:
#1: Batteries that cannot sustain high currents without substantial voltage drop exhibit higher levels of current ripple. This can mean lesser-quality cells that are rated "optimistically" or cells that simply don't have the C and mAh rating combination. And before anyone chimes in, I'm not talking about MA cells in paticular, but
any cell.
#2: The MMM (capable of 200A) probably has less total rdson value than the MM (capable of 100A). OK, this is not a fact, but an assumption.
#3: The MMM seems to be more sensitive to batteries than the MM for the same setup. Again, not a fact, but an observation.
#4: The issue with the UBEC dying is now attributed to a batch of less-than-stellar components. Ok, this isn't really related to the point, but I thought I'd throw that one in just to have a comprehensive list.
The only conclusion I can come up with for #3 is that the slightly higher rdson value in the MM setup helps to slightly reduce the battery's available current to the motor. Not much, but enough. The MMM is a "larger pipe", so the motor is free to pull as much current as it needs - at least slightly more so than the MM. This higher level of current causes more ripple current and is not good for batteries.
Does this sounds plausible? Does anyone have eagletree graphs of the same setup comparing the current levels using the MM and then the MMM? Would a few more caps to the battery input leads help protect cells like in #1?