RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > RC-Monster Area > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Out runners mounted to hubs
Old
  (#1)
bigsteel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Out runners mounted to hubs - 03.11.2011, 10:54 PM

How come nobody has done this to an RC yet? It seems like common practice on full scale rigs,and it is inherently efficient as there is no drivetrain loss and to me atleast,seems like I would be very easy to do. Just solid mount the motors to the hubs wear the bearings once were.any thoughts?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
_paralyzed_
working on a brushless for my wheelchair.....
 
_paralyzed_'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,890
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: minnesnowta
03.11.2011, 11:11 PM

4x speed controls, wiring nightmare, extensive trial and error to get "gearing" right, no gearing flexibility for different tire profiles, cost.

We will get there.


_______________________________________

It's "Dr. _paralyzed_" actually. Not like with a PhD, but Doctor like in Dr. Pepper.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
bigsteel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
03.11.2011, 11:35 PM

Ok,forgot about the esc,is there ANY way to run multiple motors off one esc? And as for wiring it wouldn't be too awful.maybe not pretty but I think it could work. And what about planetary hubs? Could give you your gearing options right there. I agree it would be hard,but not impossible.maybe a 1/5 scale would be easier due to it's size?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
brainanator
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
brainanator's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 738
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Williston, ND
03.11.2011, 11:48 PM

I saw someone on here do it to a micro T :D I think....the guy with the avatar is him holding a potato gun (or other similar styled projectile launcher)


OFNA Jammin CRT.5e, Savage Flux HP, MBX5Te, SCX10, Multirotors, foam planes
  Send a message via Yahoo to brainanator Send a message via MSN to brainanator  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
bigsteel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
03.11.2011, 11:56 PM

Metallover built one? Huh,might have to look for that build.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
lincpimp
Check out my huge box!
 
lincpimp's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
03.12.2011, 01:44 AM

Startup loads would be massive. Plus unsprung weight would be very high so handling would be crap. Replacing the diff would be better, but you still have the high startup load to consider. I personally like the direct to diff, ie replacing the center gearing/trans with an outrunner.

I have plans to do a dual outrunner direct to diff setup on a 1/5 scale car. I will have to use 2 esc, but I can basically mount the outrunner shaft directly to the pinion gear. So it will open up the center of the chassis to allow all of the componets (batteries, escs, etc) to be mounted right on the center line.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
brainanator
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
brainanator's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 738
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Williston, ND
03.12.2011, 02:30 AM

http://www.rc-monster.com/forum/show...t=22629&page=2
yup, glad you remembered his name based on his avatar :p


OFNA Jammin CRT.5e, Savage Flux HP, MBX5Te, SCX10, Multirotors, foam planes
  Send a message via Yahoo to brainanator Send a message via MSN to brainanator  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
What's_nitro?
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
 
What's_nitro?'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
03.12.2011, 03:45 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigsteel View Post
How come nobody has done this to an RC yet? It seems like common practice on full scale rigs,and it is inherently efficient as there is no drivetrain loss and to me atleast,seems like I would be very easy to do. Just solid mount the motors to the hubs wear the bearings once were.any thoughts?
I'm working on it.

   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Cody.McP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
03.12.2011, 01:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lincpimp View Post
Startup loads would be massive. Plus unsprung weight would be very high so handling would be crap. Replacing the diff would be better, but you still have the high startup load to consider. I personally like the direct to diff, ie replacing the center gearing/trans with an outrunner.

I have plans to do a dual outrunner direct to diff setup on a 1/5 scale car. I will have to use 2 esc, but I can basically mount the outrunner shaft directly to the pinion gear. So it will open up the center of the chassis to allow all of the componets (batteries, escs, etc) to be mounted right on the center line.
Ditto on what the pimp said. I was thinking about doing something like this in a Baja but there would just be a ton of unsprung weight and it is too complicated/expensive to be worth it IMO. 4x MMM, 4x 6s Lipo, 4x Motor = $$$$. If I was to build a crawler (without any real knowledge of crawlers) I'd maybe give it a shot and have some system set up where I can power any of the wheels individually on demand, would make kind of a cool traction system.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
bigsteel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
03.12.2011, 02:10 PM

I didn't think about how it would affect the suspension. I guess motors replacing diffs would be more practical in this application. I'm gonna draw something up on my drafting table,I've got an idea on how to gear the motors and still allow adjustment. Althoughthis makes me wonder,how well do full size supercars handle with Hub motors? The Audi r8 that was electric had like 800hp and 3000ft/lbs so it was probably negligible to the gains.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com