RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Team Tekin

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#31)
hemiblas
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
hemiblas's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 433
Join Date: Oct 2007
04.25.2011, 06:51 PM

I have used the 25-50C 6000mah nanotechs and can also vouch for them. If there was a problem it would have been due to a bad cell and not the batteries ability to perform. For what its worth, its just not easy figuring out which batteries are good and which ones are not. One manufactures 100C is another manufacturer's 10C. Thats how far off base we are in todays world.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#32)
TekinTeamMgr
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
TekinTeamMgr's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 235
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: California
04.25.2011, 08:05 PM

Very true....
  Send a message via Yahoo to TekinTeamMgr  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#33)
scarletboa
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
scarletboa's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 929
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Las Vegas NV
05.04.2011, 11:46 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TekinTeamMgr View Post
Very true....
my bottom line with the turnigy nano-tech packs is that they are some of the most conservatively rated packs i have seen so far. if you were to obtain a turnigy nano-tech pack, you would see what i mean. i have name brand packs that are rated higher according to the manufacturer than the turnigy packs and they still fail to run as strong.

perfect example:

i have a pair of 30c 5000mah 3s neu-energy packs.
i also have a pair of turnigy (not the nano-tech) 25c 5000mah 3s packs.........the turnigies perform much better and even a normal bystander could tell the difference.

another scenario:

i have a of thunderpower 45c 2200mah 3s pack
i also have 2 turnigy (non-nano-tech) 40c 2200mah 3s packs

the 2200mah packs are all used in a high-amp plane and the turnigies provide longer flight times, faster RPMs and temp about 10F cooler than the tunderpower. all 3 batteries have equal use and equal treatment. also, the thunderpower is getting a little puffy while the turnigies are still solid.



the turnigies were substantially cheaper and they are rated lower, yet they are the superior packs. they always temp lower and they have noticeably more punch and lower voltage drop.

the nano-tech turnigy packs are rated even more conservatively than the non-nano-tech packs.


They say a good mechanic only needs 2 tools - WD40 & Duct tape. If it moves, and its not supposed to, duct tape. If it doesn't move, and its supposed to, WD40.

Last edited by scarletboa; 05.04.2011 at 11:48 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#34)
molak
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
Offline
Posts: 115
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Argentina
05.05.2011, 07:51 AM

Turnigys are Great packs ...

i have done almost a year (about 120 cicles) using a Turnigy 3s 5000 mAh 20c on my MMM geared for 42mph! and the pack is rock solid!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#35)
hemiblas
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
hemiblas's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 433
Join Date: Oct 2007
05.08.2011, 01:09 PM

They have come a long way in their battery technology. Some of the older flightmax packs were a bit overrated, but most of the new turnigy and nanotech packs are on par with whats out there. If you look at a 20C 5000mah pack vs one of the first 20C 5000mah flightmax packs you see a huge weight and size difference in the new packs.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com