Quote:
Originally Posted by himalaya
I failed to find ANY CLUE to verify that they really do the "IR and capacity matching" job when building a pack as they claimed. I mean the big names, their triple or quad price tag that customers have to pay is only for the name, the service and much of their pocket, IMO.
Here's what I found between a cheap Turnigy 5000mAh and a big name hot product 4200mAh. These are the last 1/4 ending section of the discharge curve taken from a same charger and the packs are both brand new. Can anyone say it has tighter capacity tolenrance than the much cheaper one?
Turnigy:
a hot big name pack:
Also, at 3.2A discharge(due to 80W discharge limit of my charger) my Turnigy 5000mAh delivers 5184mAh while the big name 4200mAh delivers 4043mAh. And there come many complaint the Turnigy packs are heavier than SIMILAR RATED packs. 
|
Awesome info. I think the companies in Asia are stepping up quality faster then most think. It's also up to the customer to choose how well they want something made. I like how some Hobbycity packs have 8AWG wires and other similar rated packs from other places have 12 or 10AWG and claim a much higher C rating. Some say in our application 12 or 10AWG is enough, but if some one is going to push their packs to the limits, a thicker AWG is better.