RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Buggy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
sapper_triple6
Student of RC-Monster University
 
sapper_triple6's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 207
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baumholder, Germany
12.28.2007, 08:18 PM

Very nice. I'm still debating whether or not to convert my 8ight. Dont know if I want to drop the $$$ for LiPo and I think NiMh would be too heavy.
  Send a message via Yahoo to sapper_triple6  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Chapito
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
12.28.2007, 09:49 PM

I have not(except for about two minutes in the driveway). Tomorrow's races will be the first runs on it. I am confident it will perform admirably. I have been runin' the Neu and Quark in an 8T for about 9 months already.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
squeeforever
RC-Monster Mod
 
squeeforever's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 6,254
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
12.28.2007, 10:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sapper_triple6 View Post
Very nice. I'm still debating whether or not to convert my 8ight. Dont know if I want to drop the $$$ for LiPo and I think NiMh would be too heavy.
I don't see why everybody complains about the cost. You can get a set of LiPos as cheap or cheaper than a set of NiMH...
  Send a message via AIM to squeeforever  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
starscream
RC-Monster TQ
 
starscream's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 703
Join Date: Mar 2005
12.28.2007, 11:00 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by squeeforever View Post
I don't see why everybody complains about the cost. You can get a set of LiPos as cheap or cheaper than a set of NiMH...
You also have to factor in the new hardware needed for charging/balancing and mounting & protecting the Lipo's on the chassis as well as the learning curve for the new batt chemistry as not to destroy your new investments.
Lipo's are not for folks who do not want to worry about low voltage cutoffs, discharge cutoffs, current ratings and thermal runaway .
My vote would be A123's for those types of users as the A123's are lighter than nimh's and are not as fragile/temperamental as Lipo's.


Ha Ha
The Flashlight Strikes Again...
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
squeeforever
RC-Monster Mod
 
squeeforever's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 6,254
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
12.28.2007, 11:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lincpimp View Post
Actually if you look sround you can find lipos cheap. I bought a pair of 3600 12c 2s polyquest lipos for 32 bucks each from cheapbatterypacks a few months ago. They were so good I bought another 2. Now I have a pair of 3600 4s packs, so I have over 80 amps cont plus 7200 mah of capacity. All for about $130 inc s/h. My supervee runs really good now!
Point proven.

Quote:
Originally Posted by starscream View Post
You also have to factor in the new hardware needed for charging/balancing and mounting & protecting the Lipo's on the chassis as well as the learning curve for the new batt chemistry as not to destroy your new investments.
Lipo's are not for folks who do not want to worry about low voltage cutoffs, discharge cutoffs, current ratings and thermal runaway .
My vote would be A123's for those types of users as the A123's are lighter than nimh's and are not as fragile/temperamental as Lipo's.
I'm just referring to the cost factor. Nobody mentioned the things that go with LiPo usage, like being cautious for one. Something that should be used either way...LiPo or not.

Last edited by squeeforever; 12.28.2007 at 11:46 PM.
  Send a message via AIM to squeeforever  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
starscream
RC-Monster TQ
 
starscream's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 703
Join Date: Mar 2005
12.29.2007, 04:43 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by squeeforever View Post
Point proven.



I'm just referring to the cost factor. Nobody mentioned the things that go with LiPo usage, like being cautious for one. Something that should be used either way...LiPo or not.
Cost is a relative term...
If you are converting to Lipo then you MUST take into account ALL the aspects of the new battery chemistry.

If you are strictly referring to a monetary setback then you have to also take into account the additional monetary setback for the additional hardware needed to support the new battery chemistry i.e. charger's, lvc's, balancer's etc.


Ha Ha
The Flashlight Strikes Again...
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com