The Revo slipper worked well on my "slipperential" with a 7XL and 5s2p, when I had that Revo. To my knowledge noone has used a slipperential with much more power than that, and few people have them (since they are designed for racing).
SH Z-Car, Custom Crawler, 8s Savage, 12s XTM XLB 1/7 buggy, 4wd 4-link rear/IFS Pro4 truck, Custom Hyper 10 Short Course, Belt-Drive Mammoth ST 1/8 truggy, 4s 17.5 MM Pro HPI Blitz
The Revo slipper worked well on my "slipperential" with a 7XL and 5s2p, when I had that Revo. To my knowledge noone has used a slipperential with much more power than that, and few people have them (since they are designed for racing).
Hmm.. I think I'm going to give it a shot then. I can't see the diff being the weak link.. the slipper would probably go out first, wouldn't it?
I can say that the revo slipper is pretty tough. If you are going use it for acceleration limiting like 10th scale it will wear quickly. But if you are using it for gear/drivetrain protection you should be ok (slipper set reasonably tight). I have metalman's old revo with the slipperential and it works fine for me. I am actually going to hold off on my other revo project until the center diff with the integrated slipper is released. That looks like the most promising method to me!
I can say that the revo slipper is pretty tough. If you are going use it for acceleration limiting like 10th scale it will wear quickly. But if you are using it for gear/drivetrain protection you should be ok (slipper set reasonably tight). I have metalman's old revo with the slipperential and it works fine for me. I am actually going to hold off on my other revo project until the center diff with the integrated slipper is released. That looks like the most promising method to me!
Thanks for the input. I'd like to be able to use that new slipperential, but I fear that the lack of extra spur gears/gearing options could cause a problem for me. I may just hold off to see how durable/how well it works though.
The lack of gearing is a good point. I will use an outrunner so I will have a slower turning, higher torque motor. The lack of gearing will not cause me too much of an issue due to that motor choice. The std slipperential with the added gear reduction works well. If I made one for myself, I would use a 46t diff gear, as it would affort more space for a similar sized spur gear, that would not contact the diff output on the slipper side of the assembly. I usually run 46t spurs (modified mgt spurs to fit the revo slipper).
I think I'm going to first go with a standard slipperential with a revo slipper, this will allow me to put the motor in a good distance above the driveline. It will also allow me to use a somewhat crazy idea to adjust the gear mesh (not having to move the motor to adjust it). I wish I could explain it with words, but I'll have to draw it to explain. On to Solidworks tutorials!