RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > RC-Monster Area > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
rabosi
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
Offline
Posts: 326
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Levittown, NY
08.13.2009, 04:01 PM

I'm a bit late to this discussion but as mentioned before, of the techs currently available nuclear is the best option for electricity imo. Just model it after the French system. Not only do we get cheap electric for cars but we can eliminate all the fossil fueled power plants which are a major contributor to greenhouse gases. Nuclear as a standard would be a tough sell in the U.S. though. Too many ignorant/uneducated people combined with special interest groups feeding them the b.s.

As far as electric cars, it will be very interesting to see the evolution of batteries and motors over the next few years. Humans are quite resource and inventive when they have to be.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Finnster
KillaHurtz
 
Finnster's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,958
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bucks Co, PA
08.13.2009, 04:09 PM

TDI's and other advanced diesels are awesome. As cool as the elec car could be (a bit biased here obviously) its rediculous we don't have good small diesels here. The few you can get are overpriced VWs (fvcl< VWs btw.)

Really, until battery tech comes along, I don't understand why there are not more small cars w/ diesels. Plus they last forever. I would get one of those way before a hybrid (which just seems too complicated to be reliable long term, esp if it has NIMH batts.)
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
TexasSP
Something, anything, nothing
 
TexasSP's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,747
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
08.13.2009, 06:28 PM

Don't forget that Amtrak is heavily subsidized by the fed, not too mention that every other passenger rail system in the US is owned by some form of government local, state, or federal. Of course rail would not be here period if it had not been heavily subsidized and influenced via the government.

The only way I support rail is by investing in mag-lev technology. It is the most efficient means for commuter rail today. It's quiet too.

As far as the big companies I hold no harsh feelings for them. They are what got many great things to where they are today. No reason to hate that. Any individual tries to influence things to their best interests as well for the most part. You also most note that most all of these large companies started off small.

In fact the computer you are typing on is made by a large company, the internet, well you had better thank AT&T and Verizon for the lines. It's all big business and we all enjoy it, no reason to hate.

I can tell you this for sure, I have never made a penny nor had my life made better by anyone sitting around ranting about conspiracy theories.

Going back to the big ocean liners, my question again is: How else do you move that much cargo more efficiently? I can guarantee you reap the benefits of their existence in more ways than 1.


www.cubicle101.com
A friends comic strip website.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
redshift
RC-Monster Square Tube
 
redshift's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,367
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CNY
08.13.2009, 06:49 PM

I sincerely hope I didn't come across as ranting....

I don't think the container ship pollution was pointed out so much as something to be solved, but more that the focus on cars as the worst source of pollution is really a bit silly.

I'd like to extend a personal thank you to the members who are willing to go out on a limb with unpopular ideas, and who are not afraid to take some flak.

This is how real progress is made and I hope to be a part of it. Even if some people want me to stick my head back in the sand....

Not happenin'
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
JThiessen
RC-Monster Brushless
 
JThiessen's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,436
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonds WA
08.13.2009, 08:00 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by redshift View Post
I sincerely hope I didn't come across as ranting....

I don't think the container ship pollution was pointed out so much as something to be solved, but more that the focus on cars as the worst source of pollution is really a bit silly............

This is how real progress is made and I hope to be a part of it. Even if some people want me to stick my head back in the sand....

Not happenin'
Eh, problem with sand is that it still has some air pockets in it!!!


When discussing problems and solutions, people will tend to get overwhelmed when looking at the bigger picture, and not do anything. I'll use the ships as an example - why bother doing anything with auto's when ships/trucks/trains all put out about as much or more than the cars do? They will get so involved in trying to come up with the impossible solution, they will end up frustrated and defeated and walk away without doing anything. With such a vast issue, we/they gotta hit the easy stuff first (commuter cars, it appears), and put our faith in our ability to take a technology and improve it.

Personally, I've been forcing myself to run some biodiesel in my truck. Mileage is worse, price is higher. Will biofuels ever replace petro? I doubt it, but maybe with me and many others dumping our money into it, they might develop something better down the road - plus it puts some of the money back here in the states.

Mag lev technology is some cool stuff. Did you know that they have developed it as an energy source now? Couple years back we had some folks from our Phantom Works dept (now there's some conspiracy work there!!!) come in and give a demo on it as a power source. I dont think I am allowed to describe the process, but our application was that we were implementing a moving line for the airplanes, and one of the issues was how do we supply power to the mechanics and power the crawlers to move the airplane(s) without having this gigantic extension chord. Well, it turned out that we now have a huge extension chord.....

One solution to the container ships is to not ship it. At least for the "import" side we could bring that manufacturing back here......yeah, right......


Losi 8T 1.0, Savage Flux - XL style, LST XXL, Muggy, 3.3 E-Revo Conversion and sitting outside 425hp, 831 Tq Dodge Ram Turbo Diesel. It SMOKES
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
redshift
RC-Monster Square Tube
 
redshift's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,367
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CNY
08.13.2009, 08:20 PM

Well, truth is I am actually from the planet Ylkhdsbn, (closest phonetic equivalent in the English language) and I do not require your planet's filthy oxygen to survive. In fact our species thrives in a hydrocarbon environment, which is why we have set in place such wonderful technologies that you have mistakenly thought were your own. Foolish naive human. Did you really think you came up with the internal combustion engine?

As you humans say, pffft.

Good one btw JT... but those air pockets don't last long.... at least that is what I am told.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
08.13.2009, 10:00 PM

Well a great alternative, and a replacement to container ships that is more efficient, much lower costs, and more reliable is BLIMP baby! There are designs out there that are over 300m square, and would use a small fraction of the fuel that a container ship uses to move per cargo.

Besides that, if the whole economic system was not a capital type system, then we would be doing all of our own manufacturing, our own work, and not slave labor in some distant land.

I too agree that the new Nuclear power systems are quite good, and should be seriously considered. Although, the cold fusion debate is quite heated right now, and I personally believe that it works. The whole B. Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann harassment when it was supposedly 'debunked' in '89 was ridiculous.

Some scientists from here in Canada just recently came up with a very cheap nuclear fusion system. HERE.


Remember, there is a big difference between conspiracy theories , and a conspiracy... a theory has no evidence for, whereas the latter does.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Erevocanuck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
08.13.2009, 11:47 PM

I see a few people bring up environment & don`t realize what it takes to process petroleum.The Province of Alberta supplies alot of the petroleum to North America & the ecological damage is just beginning to show.
To process the tar sands they have physically remove the earth from a open pit mine & then taken to be separated so the Petroleum.Theirs evidence that ground water is being poisoned & wildlife/plant life are being effected.
I guess my point is that for a car to pollute it needs gas & it just more then what comes out the tail pipe of the vehicle that the probelm
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
08.14.2009, 12:57 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erevocanuck View Post
I see a few people bring up environment & don`t realize what it takes to process petroleum.The Province of Alberta supplies alot of the petroleum to North America & the ecological damage is just beginning to show.
To process the tar sands they have physically remove the earth from a open pit mine & then taken to be separated so the Petroleum.Theirs evidence that ground water is being poisoned & wildlife/plant life are being effected.
I guess my point is that for a car to pollute it needs gas & it just more then what comes out the tail pipe of the vehicle that the probelm
yeah, it's disgusting what has happened to Fort McMurray, you can see the place from space... looking at north America, on google earth, it stands out like a sore thumb. They want to do the same thing here in Saskatchewan now, makes me sad, destroying our beautiful province.


Also, one of the biggest, if not the biggest concerns that should be at top priority of people is our food. Chemicals can not be used on the land anymore as it is destroying the soil, our health, and our future. My family run a certified organic oil crushing plant, mainly Flax oil (should be apart of everyone's diet), and we buy as much organic foods as possible, and keep processed foods to a minimum. The food people are eating is the main culprit to the rise in cancer these days, and many many other health issues/diseases.

I bring up these other issues because we just don't have one problem of transportation... I could go on, and on, and on, page after page of just a note of the problems in the world. It's everywhere. Something has to change... and I hate to say it, but the world cannot support 6+billion people for much longer, something has to give. I can see something happening soon, as so many things are coming to a crossroads: political, geographical, biological processes, astronomical/ cycles... it's scary really, there are too many coincidences to just say poof poof. Maybe those year 2012 prophecies have something to them?


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
08.14.2009, 01:11 AM

Back to electric cars... SSC (Shelby SuperCars) of USA have their Ultimate Aero EV coming this year. 1000hp and IIRC, around 3000lbs, that is quite a bit higher power/weight ratio than our powerful Bl R/C's, and it can actually put it down to the ground.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
jayjay283
RC-Monster Titanium
 
jayjay283's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,777
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Illinois
08.13.2009, 11:54 PM

Sort of back to the beginning but the last electric car I read about in rc car and driver. Its battery was $16,000 but it could only be used to 50% of burn out rate (1 run for maxamps) doh. j/k but at that rate it could be used to store the solar power for a house for 20 years. resold to housing as that for near $8g. After that of course they didnt talk about. 400lbs of lipo X 500,000 dont even want to think about, but a good short term solution
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com