RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
suicideneil
Old Skool
 
suicideneil's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 7,494
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Devon, England
12.24.2010, 01:04 AM

Not to my 2nd email I sent them after they responded on their website, though there is this:

http://www.bigsquidrc.com/ask-cub-re...on-12-16-2010/

I dont think they know the meaning of a hardcore test.

I also noticed they had 'news' of an amazing 150amp esc from Leopard thats totally new and original, if by that they ment 100% identical to the older hobbywing 150amp esc:

http://www.bigsquidrc.com/ask-cub-re...on-12-16-2010/

The more I read on that site ( havent looked at the forum, I cant imagine what horrors await in there... ), the more I cant help thinking its written by the same kind of 'tards that write RCCA- just utter nonsense and biased reviews. Lame.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
thzero
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 800
Join Date: Oct 2009
12.24.2010, 11:06 AM

All I can say is at least they are trying. Show me another website, or mag, that caters to bashers and general R/C news. And they are always on the lookout for new writers. Why not instead of "bashing" them, you volunteer to do some more 'hardcode' reporting/testing/writing for them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by suicideneil View Post
The more I read on that site ( havent looked at the forum, I cant imagine what horrors await in there... ), the more I cant help thinking its written by the same kind of 'tards that write RCCA- just utter nonsense and biased reviews. Lame.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
suicideneil
Old Skool
 
suicideneil's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 7,494
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Devon, England
12.25.2010, 04:47 PM

I tried to correct them and inform them where they were going wrong with their testing, but they pretty much just brushed aside my concerns- I get the feeling they arent interested in carrying out 'serious' testing, they just like writing sensationalist articles and 'fluff' stories. Clearly they are a just some group of drivers who write a website, yet dont have much of a technical background to draw upon; anyone who thinks comparing dissimilar lipos in the same graph is a fair way to create an article is clearly not interested in honest facts and figures to help people make informed buying choices.

Take another look at all their articles- they even compare junky radios to top of the line radios with completely different features and specs, then draw the conclusion that the expensive radios are better; again, noobs leading noobs pretty much....
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com