RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > RC-Monster Area > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
BrianG
RC-Monster Admin
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
06.14.2012, 11:59 AM

I've always noticed that Hyperion balance-chargers and stand-alone balancers tend to be very sensitive to pretty much ANY imbalance. While that's good to a degree, it can worry the inexperienced user that their pack isn't "right".
  Send a message via Yahoo to BrianG Send a message via MSN to BrianG  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
pinkpanda3310
RC-Monster Titanium
 
pinkpanda3310's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,152
Join Date: Sep 2008
06.14.2012, 07:53 PM

I don't have that charger, I have a cheap chinese one. It is not accurate when balancing and over time I beleive it has gotten slightly worse. Some packs it can balance to with in 0.02v, these are usually packs with less cycles, charged at less amps and don't require a whole lot of balancing to start with.

Other more dodgey packs I have (reclaimed A123's from dewalt battery packs) get to with in 0.05 - 0.07v and will not balance. I am not able to measure the resistance of the cells but I suspect that is what is screwing around with the charger.

That's how I understand it anyway. The different resistance causes the cells to relax to different voltages, when a cell will not hold 4.19 - 4.20v and others will, the charger/balancer is constantly working.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
06.14.2012, 11:35 PM

Well it looks like I am not the only one with the issue then. It never used to do this up until a few weeks ago, but I thought it was the older packs I had. But I have been trying to put a few light wake up cycles on some new 6s 2200mah 45c G3's. (which, btw, are tiny!)

Some of you are saying that the cells will go up and down; I have some old old A123 packs with balance taps that I tried and the cell imbalance will continue to increase... 0.03v gap....0.06v gap....0.10v gap, it's retarded. The only way I could get them within an acceptable balance was to use a resistor through the balance tap.

I bought a HP Sentry 2, so maybe i'll just use that for balancing the pack will charging, not that a G3 pack will need much balancing anyway.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
pinkpanda3310
RC-Monster Titanium
 
pinkpanda3310's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,152
Join Date: Sep 2008
06.15.2012, 12:22 AM

Yes, I've acheived better results from an external balancer. Though I do lower the charge amps particularly with the A123's so as not to overcharge any cells. The charger will 'charge on' despite any cell differences until the desired pack voltage is reached.

I've never heard of using a resistor on the balance tap. Is that a resistor for every pin on the tap?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
06.15.2012, 09:26 AM

No, I just use a 10W resistor, plug it into the tap and use a volt meter to watch the voltage until it reaches where I want it, then I move to the next cell.

I was thinking of getting the new 1420i charger, 550w and 20amps, whats not to like... that is, if the sentry balancer cannot keep up with the charge rate


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
_paralyzed_
working on a brushless for my wheelchair.....
 
_paralyzed_'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,890
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: minnesnowta
06.15.2012, 04:48 PM

It's simply an out of balance cell. When charging the charger charges all of the cells all of the time, and then stops charging and bleeds off voltage from the highest cells until they are all even.

You will see that the output is switching back and forth from 0v to full pack voltage during this process.

The "bad" or "low" cell just takes a while to reach the full 4.2v, and the "good" cells with low internal resistance easily reach 4.2v. It does take quite a bit of time for this cell balance dance to take place.

This is where a charger with individual cell charging shines and the rest fall short.


_______________________________________

It's "Dr. _paralyzed_" actually. Not like with a PhD, but Doctor like in Dr. Pepper.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
06.15.2012, 07:49 PM

It's not a low or imbalanced cell(s) in the pack, it is the charger. Like I said, it will UNbalance a properly balanced pack. It is doing it to brand new G3 45C packs I have hear just as bad as my old 35C G3 packs.

I just got the Sentry in the mail today and WOW, this thing is awesome, tells you everything about your pack, beautiful clear screen. I tested it out on a 4s A123 pack that had a low cell in it, total cell gap was over 0.200 volts, it balanced it out in about an hour, down to within 25mv. I will try doing some charging using this thing attached to balance port, seems to have a very decent balancing current.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
jayjay283
RC-Monster Titanium
 
jayjay283's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,777
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Illinois
06.17.2012, 11:33 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG View Post
I've always noticed that Hyperion balance-chargers and stand-alone balancers tend to be very sensitive to pretty much ANY imbalance. While that's good to a degree, it can worry the inexperienced user that their pack isn't "right".
Thanks for the words of encouragement bro
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
06.20.2012, 08:56 AM

Well it seems like the charger is smartening up now, the more I use it the better it is working. I will only take a few extra minutes to balance off a pack, I don't understand this, but I like the fact.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
chrismechanic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
06.20.2012, 10:40 AM

wow...it looks like you stumbled across the worlds first self educating charger
you probably just had a bit of junk in the balancer plug/socket..
chris
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
06.20.2012, 06:53 PM

Who knows... but at least I dont have to buy a new one.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
what C
Old
  (#12)
mikesauto
RC-Monster Stock
 
mikesauto's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 47
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: wa.
what C - 06.20.2012, 07:59 PM

what c rating did you set it at for the first charge? I heard 1C is good to start for first five or so runs and then bump it up for faster charge and better bal.

Last edited by mikesauto; 06.20.2012 at 08:37 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
06.20.2012, 11:08 PM

I have done about 8 cycles on each pack, starting at 1C, then 2 @ 2C, then 2 @ 3C, 2 @ 4C, I have only done one charge at 5C rating.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com