RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Castle Creations

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
SPC Racing
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 17
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PA
12.29.2010, 10:51 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RC-Monster Mike View Post
Supporting clones in any way is condoning theft. Time, money, sweat, etc. are spent in engineering, trial and error, equipment, parts, etc. in the development of any innovative new part - of course a clone can be sold for less...they STOLE the engineering costs. This is no different than stealing a car in the big picture of things. Buying a clone ought to be punishable by law as an accessory to stealing IMO.
Thank you Mike!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
toplakd
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
Offline
Posts: 68
Join Date: Feb 2010
12.29.2010, 03:24 AM

People who are buying castle will always buy castle products. IMO this product looks identical just on outside. You can not tell what is inside and if it is copied.

Dejan


I removed my signature.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Losi LST2
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
Offline
Posts: 74
Join Date: Mar 2010
12.29.2010, 10:41 AM

Yea i've decided i'm done with hobby king too now....i'll run my current packs till their done and thats it...i can get roar approved packs from amain for only a slight amount more then packs with shipping from HK anyway
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
slimthelineman
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
slimthelineman's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 608
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: IBEW
12.29.2010, 12:57 PM

Why does everyone only pick on the Chinese companies? I think I was the only one to complain when Slovak coppied cc with their novalink that looks exactly like the castle link. So it's ok when an American company does it? Leave the lipos alone too. Show me where else I can get 4 2s and 2 6s and 2 4s for under $250. Same stuff as here. How is it any different when an American company buys overseas cells and puts their sticker on them for a huge profit?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
thzero
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 800
Join Date: Oct 2009
12.29.2010, 01:23 PM

I highly doubt that the NovaLink is a clone or duplicate of Castle's. Novak, being an American company that has been in the r/c business, and business in general, for a long time isn't that stupid.

As for the batteries; buying cheap cells and slapping a label on them and then charging huge upcharge is just explotation no matter where the company is located. That being said, a lot of the non-"Chinese" batteries that were mentioned do more than just buy cells and slap a label on them.


Quote:
Originally Posted by slimthelineman View Post
Why does everyone only pick on the Chinese companies? I think I was the only one to complain when Slovak coppied cc with their novalink that looks exactly like the castle link. So it's ok when an American company does it? Leave the lipos alone too. Show me where else I can get 4 2s and 2 6s and 2 4s for under $250. Same stuff as here. How is it any different when an American company buys overseas cells and puts their sticker on them for a huge profit?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
SPC Racing
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 17
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PA
12.29.2010, 02:06 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by slimthelineman View Post
Why does everyone only pick on the Chinese companies?
Because in this case Hobby King is directly and blatantly stealing from Castle.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
BMW318TI
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
12.31.2010, 09:25 PM

I don't see a problem for CC link.
It's a simple usb serial converter.
I have FMA, Hyperion links they looks all same.
Most of those chips have the same components usage.
Ps Hyperion link see my MMM esc, but the CC software doesn't see the Hyperion link.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
brushlessboy16
Im not dark, Im over ripened! xD
 
brushlessboy16's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,607
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Westampton NJ
12.29.2010, 01:08 PM

Glad I posted this when I did... I think I opened up pandora's box with this one..


As for a blatant copy of a well respected product I do not support them. They look exactly like castle units, The internals like the FET boards look to be primitive in comparison to castle units that I have seen. But I just boggles my mind to think that if you go through your "research and development" of a product, Why the hell would you dress it as the competitors?

I have no problem buying batteries through hobbyking as they are not copied, derived or stolen from another company-as far as we know. but Never will I buy a wanna be castle esc.


I have way too much respect for castle creations.
THe only esc's I own are castle's

My castle collection:
5 castle links
2 working Mamba Monsters
1 Dead mamba monster
2 artur modded mamba max's
1 Castle BEC
1 Castle BEC pro
1 CC 2200
1 HPI CC 2650
Castle 32p Pinions

Too man 6.5mm bullet connectors to count

I support Castle :)


Benjamin White
R/c Monster Team Driver
Jq the car, LST, Sportweks turmoil pro
Unconventional Techniques, Superior Results
  Send a message via Yahoo to brushlessboy16 Send a message via AIM to brushlessboy16 Send a message via MSN to brushlessboy16  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
slimthelineman
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
slimthelineman's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 608
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: IBEW
12.29.2010, 03:42 PM

Why don't you take a look at a picture of the novalink. I might be blind but I'm not dumb. Have you ever raced with or dealt with any novak reps? They are one of the reasons I will never use novak.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
brushlessboy16
Im not dark, Im over ripened! xD
 
brushlessboy16's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,607
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Westampton NJ
12.29.2010, 03:53 PM

Engage Off topic!





Similar components but a direct copy? I dont know.

the idea of a usb programmer might have come from the castle link (by some of our standards that would be theft in R&D)

Up for discussion

Disengage off topic mode.


Benjamin White
R/c Monster Team Driver
Jq the car, LST, Sportweks turmoil pro
Unconventional Techniques, Superior Results
  Send a message via Yahoo to brushlessboy16 Send a message via AIM to brushlessboy16 Send a message via MSN to brushlessboy16  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Thomas Porfert
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
Thomas Porfert's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 301
Join Date: Feb 2008
12.29.2010, 05:42 PM

As far as the Castle Link goes, it's not so much the use of individual components that's the potential problem. Castle holds a patent for "providing a method and apparatus for reprogramming an electronic speed control (“ESC”) through the receive (“RX”) port of an electric radio controlled model vehicle." Patent #7740516. I'll leave it at that.

Thomas Porfert
Tech Support
Castle Creations
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
brushlessboy16
Im not dark, Im over ripened! xD
 
brushlessboy16's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,607
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Westampton NJ
12.29.2010, 06:39 PM

In that case, then yes It seems Novak is guilty of plagiarism.

Is there a link to the patents that castle holds, or is that sensitive information in some way?


Benjamin White
R/c Monster Team Driver
Jq the car, LST, Sportweks turmoil pro
Unconventional Techniques, Superior Results
  Send a message via Yahoo to brushlessboy16 Send a message via AIM to brushlessboy16 Send a message via MSN to brushlessboy16  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
thzero
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 800
Join Date: Oct 2009
12.29.2010, 07:02 PM

Plagiarism, no. Potential patent infringement? Potentially, for lawyers to debate after all while the description is pretty broad, the specifics are fairly detailed. But whoever makes Losi's Xcelerion is most likely in violation as well as maybe Tekin.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7740516.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by brushlessboy16 View Post
In that case, then yes It seems Novak is guilty of plagiarism.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
slimthelineman
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
slimthelineman's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 608
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: IBEW
12.29.2010, 07:24 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by thzero View Post
Plagiarism, no. Potential patent infringement? Potentially, for lawyers to debate after all while the description is pretty broad, the specifics are fairly detailed. But whoever makes Losi's Xcelerion is most likely in violation as well as maybe Tekin.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7740516.html
Wow cc is already puttin the heat to em on the market share and they are just tryin to give the rest of it away. Go castle! Lol
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
slimthelineman
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
slimthelineman's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 608
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: IBEW
12.29.2010, 06:42 PM

They could have tried a little harder with the name for starters IMO. Par for novak in my book though. Orange boxes are for emergency triangles under the seat in the bucket truck. Replica or not it falls into the same catagory of schistey principals that everyone is upset about all the sudden. Nobody complains about OTC generic drugs, but buys them cause their way cheaper. Not the best comparison but you get the idea. Fact is not all copies are created equall. Sure the drug referance is about identical ingredients, but the electronics are a different story. You reall think the hk stuff uses the same high quality fets and componets? I bet my bottom dollar they don't. All I'm sayin is with electronics you usually get what you pay for. Buy the knockoff a bunch of times cause it fails all the time or buy the real thing once and have the worlds greatest cs at your side just in case it actually turns into a monster and carries you off.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com