RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Castle Creations

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
GriffinRU
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
06.13.2008, 12:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG View Post
Speaking of crawlers, wouldn't a stepper motor be a better idea altogether? Granted, the wiring would be a PITA depending on the number of steps...
It would overheat in no time.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
BrianG
RC-Monster Admin
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
06.13.2008, 12:49 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GriffinRU View Post
It would overheat in no time.
Really? Hmm, I would've thought otherwise. Make the motor large enough and do some electronic trickery to reduce the current X number of seconds after each step coil is energized, or something like that.
  Send a message via Yahoo to BrianG Send a message via MSN to BrianG  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
GriffinRU
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
06.13.2008, 01:01 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG View Post
Really? Hmm, I would've thought otherwise. Make the motor large enough and do some electronic trickery to reduce the current X number of seconds after each step coil is energized, or something like that.
Stepping through the rocks would be hard, while smooth rolling would be great. Stepper's are good when you need holding torque, but they are not efficient as you can see. While at mid-to-high RPM you can stall them at unexpected load.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Pdelcast
RC-Monster Titanium
 
Pdelcast's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,697
Join Date: Mar 2008
06.13.2008, 01:05 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG View Post
Really? Hmm, I would've thought otherwise. Make the motor large enough and do some electronic trickery to reduce the current X number of seconds after each step coil is energized, or something like that.
Brian,

Think about a brushless motor as a stepper motor with magnets and a synchronous controller. :)


Patrick del Castillo
President, Principle Engineer
Castle Creations
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
BrianG
RC-Monster Admin
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
06.13.2008, 01:12 PM

Yeah, I understand that, but I figured since there are so many more phases to get more samples from, slow running would be smoother. In effect, a hundred-phase BL motor.

In a regular 3-phase BL motor, you have to get so many revs before you can get a good reading on actual rotation, so slow/stall conditions are harder to deal with.

Just throwing ideas out, sometimes it's nice to think outside the norm...
  Send a message via Yahoo to BrianG Send a message via MSN to BrianG  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
GriffinRU
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
06.13.2008, 01:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG View Post
Yeah, I understand that, but I figured since there are so many more phases to get more samples from, slow running would be smoother. In effect, a hundred-phase BL motor.

In a regular 3-phase BL motor, you have to get so many revs before you can get a good reading on actual rotation, so slow/stall conditions are harder to deal with.

Just throwing ideas out, sometimes it's nice to think outside the norm...
There are 2 phases (sometimes 4, still wired as 2) and just 200/400 slots rotor, think sync as Patrick said. The only feedback is encoder...
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
johnrobholmes
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
johnrobholmes's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 905
Join Date: Aug 2007
06.13.2008, 01:17 PM

I have done some research on stepper type motors for crawling, and the main issue is the resistance of the phases (in effort to prevent ridiculous amp draw) and that the ESC would have to be matched to the motor in terms of PWM so that the coils didn't blow under load.

It would be much simpler to just throw a sensor on an outrunner to bump up the starting torque and zero rpm sync, then switch to sensorless at around 500 to 1000 rpm depending on motor. Some over current protection might be a good idea.


---JRH---

Last edited by johnrobholmes; 06.13.2008 at 01:19 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
bdebde
That's All Folks!
 
bdebde's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,359
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: in a VAN down by the RIVER
06.13.2008, 03:17 PM

I guess I will have to install the MGM in my truck this weekend (just got it back with 3.23 firmware), since it looks like I will have to wait a while on the MMM sent in for replacement. Maybe the new firmware on the MGM will allow me to run reverse without all the quirks (crosses fingers). Castle IS by far better on the software side, I run reverse on the mm's (as well as the MMM for the whole 5 min I got to run it) and never worry about it, until I need it, it just all works like it should. I have had all kinds of wierd things go on with the MGM at one time or another. One nice thing on the MGM is the ability to read out the max temp (internal) and the amps (hint, hint Patrick).
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
06.13.2008, 03:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdebde View Post
I guess I will have to install the MGM in my truck this weekend (just got it back with 3.23 firmware), since it looks like I will have to wait a while on the MMM sent in for replacement. Maybe the new firmware on the MGM will allow me to run reverse without all the quirks (crosses fingers). Castle IS by far better on the software side, I run reverse on the mm's (as well as the MMM for the whole 5 min I got to run it) and never worry about it, until I need it, it just all works like it should. I have had all kinds of wierd things go on with the MGM at one time or another. One nice thing on the MGM is the ability to read out the max temp (internal) and the amps (hint, hint Patrick).
Let me know how your MGM does with the Neu.
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
bdebde
That's All Folks!
 
bdebde's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,359
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: in a VAN down by the RIVER
06.13.2008, 03:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lutach View Post
Let me know how your MGM does with the Neu.
Sure thing.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
TexasSP
Something, anything, nothing
 
TexasSP's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,747
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
06.13.2008, 05:56 PM

I have the new software and run it with the medusa with none of the reverse quirks that it had running the 600xl. The medusa's being four pole should be quite similar to the neu in behavior I would think.


www.cubicle101.com
A friends comic strip website.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
bdebde
That's All Folks!
 
bdebde's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,359
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: in a VAN down by the RIVER
06.13.2008, 10:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasSP View Post
I have the new software and run it with the medusa with none of the reverse quirks that it had running the 600xl. The medusa's being four pole should be quite similar to the neu in behavior I would think.
What version is yours.

guess I better get busy and get the thing installed.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
06.14.2008, 10:21 AM

So the new version of the firmware is working good then. Is any of you guys with the new firmware experiencing acceleration when braking? what about no braking at all when it doesn't accelerate?
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
TexasSP
Something, anything, nothing
 
TexasSP's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,747
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
06.14.2008, 11:43 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdebde View Post
What version is yours.

guess I better get busy and get the thing installed.
3.22, I bought the controller from another guy on here who had sent it off to MGM to have it updated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lutach View Post
So the new version of the firmware is working good then. Is any of you guys with the new firmware experiencing acceleration when braking? what about no braking at all when it doesn't accelerate?
On the 600XL I experienced the issues with acceleration when braking and different reverse quirks, however on the medusa these are nonexistent.


www.cubicle101.com
A friends comic strip website.

Last edited by TexasSP; 06.14.2008 at 11:45 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
06.14.2008, 12:16 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasSP View Post
On the 600XL I experienced the issues with acceleration when braking and different reverse quirks, however on the medusa these are nonexistent.
Ok, I guess I won't be selling my 2 MGMs now. I will just send them to MGM and get the 3.23 firmware and after I get them, I'll report back.
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com