 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
KillaHurtz
Offline
Posts: 2,958
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bucks Co, PA
|
12.02.2008, 05:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suicideneil
Curious. Given these are just re-badged castle systems, its kinda strange that HPI would sell them serperately- surely castle would make more money from selling their systems with their badges seperately and only allowing other companies to sell them as part of the whole rtr truck package? My main thought is that if the CC system is cheaper than the rebadged system, then HPI wont make too much from selling them seperately (especially after CC gets their slice so to speak)? If however the hpi version undercuts the CC version, then CC just shot themselves in the foot a tad...
I am well aware either HPI system can be used in any truck though Joram, but that wasnt my point- I was thinking about marketing rather than compatibility... 
|
IDK, why does General Motors sell 4 versions of the same car?
I think for one is for people who want the OEM replacement for their truck if its damaged, or only casual knowledge of BL systems. This could be hobby shops as well that do customer repairs. Plus I think HPI (or TRX) would want their name on it for notoriety. I'm sure they are paying castle a decent amt of money for licensing of the system, as well as the name change. No matter what system is purchased, castle wins.
At the end of the day, big congrats to Castle for getting a solid and affordable 1/8th BL package out and getting the OEMs to license it. There have been other vendors around for a while sitting on their asses not getting this done. How long have we spent putting various pieces together to make these things ourselves? All other vendors had strengths, but no one had all the pieces together until castle. WTF Novak (and Tekin) has been doing all this time is beyond me. Now castle is going to clean up as these things start to take off.
Granted, the whole 1/8th market has benefited greatly from RCM Mike's work and our work here, basically doing free R&D on setups for a while now. Basically the market is copying what we've already figured out and proven to be reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Skool
Offline
Posts: 7,494
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Devon, England
|
12.02.2008, 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnster
Granted, the whole 1/8th market has benefited greatly from RCM Mike's work and our work here, basically doing free R&D on setups for a while now. Basically the market is copying what we've already figured out and proven to be reliable.
|
Amen. I just wander how long it will be before someone releases a direct drive vehicle- we should patent more of our ideas... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yip Yip Yip...
Offline
Posts: 1,489
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
|
12.02.2008, 06:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnster
IDK, why does General Motors sell 4 versions of the same car?
I think for one is for people who want the OEM replacement for their truck if its damaged, or only casual knowledge of BL systems. This could be hobby shops as well that do customer repairs. Plus I think HPI (or TRX) would want their name on it for notoriety. I'm sure they are paying castle a decent amt of money for licensing of the system, as well as the name change. No matter what system is purchased, castle wins.
At the end of the day, big congrats to Castle for getting a solid and affordable 1/8th BL package out and getting the OEMs to license it. There have been other vendors around for a while sitting on their asses not getting this done. How long have we spent putting various pieces together to make these things ourselves? All other vendors had strengths, but no one had all the pieces together until castle. WTF Novak (and Tekin) has been doing all this time is beyond me. Now castle is going to clean up as these things start to take off.
Granted, the whole 1/8th market has benefited greatly from RCM Mike's work and our work here, basically doing free R&D on setups for a while now. Basically the market is copying what we've already figured out and proven to be reliable.
|
It is also for distribution reasons. You can get HPI parts in a lot more places then you can Castle parts. Castle will not care if HPI sell them seperately as Castle is still selling the escs. I also Congratulate castle for their OEM deals.
Savage: FLM Conversion, 6s, MMM, CC 1520.
Mini-T Pro: Micro Pro 6800kv, Lipo, HS-81mg, Dirt Hawgs
M18MT: Quark 33A, Y22S 6000kv, FP 2s Lipo
LRP S8-BX: RC-M Conversion, Tekin RX8 B1600KV, 6S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WARNING: May become violent.
Offline
Posts: 2,426
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wisconsin
|
12.02.2008, 10:32 PM
RIP- Tammy (9/14/08)
Lamborghini's= True Engineering Marvel's
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 66
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
listing -
12.02.2008, 11:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Stock
Offline
Posts: 18
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
12.03.2008, 01:46 AM
This thing looks *way* better built than the E-Revo or an E-maxx. I have a 3905 E-maxx and frankly I was disappointed at how flimsy it feels, especially the chassis. The plastic used in the suspension is incredibly soft too (yes I understand the need for some flex in a basher, but it's just too much). It is way too easy to strip out. And the shocks, well frankly they were the first thing I pulled off. Don't get me wrong, the 3905 E-maxx is a fine basher, but this Savage just looks so much more serious.
When I got the E-maxx I was expecting to get something as hefty and well-machined as my nitro Revo (which I have hardly run because of my impatience with nitro), but I was definitely disappointed. The E-maxx performs fine, but when you shell out that much money you should get something that has the high quality, machined feel to it IMO, not some piece of molded plastic. It makes it more enjoyable and easier to work on as well, IMO.
Anyway, wish I had waited on my brushless MT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 209
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: N. Syr. NY
|
12.03.2008, 09:44 PM
I have to much in my E maxx now to get rid of it now, but if this truck is anything like the savage x that would make it as strong as a well modded E maxx, and twice as fast. Way better deal IMO. They beat the s__t out of it in the video. Ever see traxxas do that? A true blue basher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Brushless
Offline
Posts: 2,436
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonds WA
|
12.03.2008, 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rnemhrd
I have to much in my E maxx now to get rid of it now, but if this truck is anything like the savage x that would make it as strong as a well modded E maxx, and twice as fast. Way better deal IMO. They beat the s__t out of it in the video. Ever see traxxas do that? A true blue basher.
|
Actually, yes - every weekend with my converted Revo, as I'm sure many others will attest to. The video really wasnt anything special. I'm not trying to downplay the durability of this HPI, just sticking up for our most popular brand a little.
Losi 8T 1.0, Savage Flux - XL style, LST XXL, Muggy, 3.3 E-Revo Conversion and sitting outside 425hp, 831 Tq Dodge Ram Turbo Diesel. It SMOKES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 209
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: N. Syr. NY
|
12.05.2008, 09:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JThiessen
Actually, yes - every weekend with my converted Revo, as I'm sure many others will attest to. The video really wasnt anything special. I'm not trying to downplay the durability of this HPI, just sticking up for our most popular brand a little.
|
I was refering to traxxas PR videos. Has traxxas ever put out a video where they (traxxas) beat a truck like that? If so please show it, I would like to see it.Also is your revo stock with no rpm parts added? Some nice jumps in the snow, and a tame jump down some stairs is about it.
Last edited by Rnemhrd; 12.05.2008 at 09:52 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Mod
Offline
Posts: 6,597
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
|
12.05.2008, 10:03 AM
Actually they did do a huge 60ft backflip jump over a set of railway tracks - the first time they didn't even land it...
Video isn't on the site anymore but they did do it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rnemhrd
I was refering to traxxas PR videos. Has traxxas ever put out a video where they (traxxas) beat a truck like that? If so please show it, I would like to see it.Also is your revo stock with no rpm parts added? Some nice jumps in the snow, and a tame jump down some stairs is about it.
|
Last edited by Arct1k; 12.05.2008 at 10:06 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Aluminum
Offline
Posts: 974
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Midland, MI
|
12.05.2008, 10:20 AM
Yep it was with a revo. was a huge jump. that is pretty sick IMO. I like CERTAIN traxxas products. i just make sure i get a ton of feed back form others before i buy. I do the same with HPI to cause though the savage series is nice the others are not so great.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arct1k
Actually they did do a huge 60ft backflip jump over a set of railway tracks - the first time they didn't even land it...
Video isn't on the site anymore but they did do it...
|
I fly, I drive, but most of all I crash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 76
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
12.06.2008, 11:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arct1k
Actually they did do a huge 60ft backflip jump over a set of railway tracks - the first time they didn't even land it...
Video isn't on the site anymore but they did do it...
|
you just need to know where to look 
link
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KillaHurtz
Offline
Posts: 2,958
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bucks Co, PA
|
12.03.2008, 11:50 PM
IDK, I hated my emaxx. Unreliable moneypit and always broke. Nearly quit RC over it.
Revo was much better, but difficult to work on in a lot of little ways, and a bit of a money pit too. Taking out the diffs is like brain surgery compared to other 1/8ths, plus they are far weaker and harder to tune w/ oil (as it needs to be so heavy due to silly design.) I really don't like the suspension setup anymore. Rocker posts bend easy, as can pushrods, and shocks are hard to get just right for our heavy electrics.The shocks just seem a bit undersized. A single large shock on a tower is so much simpler and tougher imo.
So far I am highly impressed w/ my Savvy. Extremely tough and far easier to work on than I ever thought. Its had lots of updates over the years, but its a pretty solid truck. Diffs are easy to get to, tranny can be serviced easy. So far nothing has been difficult to do and has lived through some tough driving w/o complaint.
Not trying to make it a Trx vs HPI thing, but in my experience I would highly recommend a Sav over a Revo for a basher, and a nearly any truggy over a Revo for racing. Revo seems a bit of a jack of all trades, master of none sort of truck. Granted I ran mine over two years and enjoyed it, but there are better trucks. I would have gotten rid of it but now I'm contemplating redoing it into a slayer. Seems like a good retirement for it.
Last edited by Finnster; 12.03.2008 at 11:51 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 463
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Malaysia
|
12.04.2008, 04:24 AM
Hyper 9e Medusa 4S, Savage 5S MMM 8XL, Jammin' 4S Neu MMM, X2 Ninja JX, X2 MMM 5S Neu, E REVO Medusa 6S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 211
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Switzerland
|
12.04.2008, 05:04 AM
hmm dude there was a link on page 3 that showed us all those pics.
i would like to see a pic of the opened tranny.
bye
rhylsadar
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |