Are Zippy Lipos safe with a Castle MMM Speedy?

[skellyo]

Originally Posted by fastbaja5b

Another flux down, fried ESC

http://www.e-savage.com/forums/showt...ed=1#post37426

In regards to this comment of yours over there:
"Until then, I would question the Trucks ability to run 3s Lipos reliably at least until someone puts out a better guideline as to what packs we should and shouldn't run."

The truck is just fine on 2 X 3S lipos. IMO, just buy something other than Zippy's and don't gear it stupid high. Mine runs just fine on 2 X 3S Neu 25C 4900's, Badlands and 20:44 gearing.

[fastbaja5b]

Yeah mine has been fine on 2 * 2s lipos (2 * 5000mah 30C Harris rc hardcased)

Seems most of these issues are with Maxamps or Zippy lipos?

[pasan]

That thread you posted does not indicate in any clear manner that the Zippys were responsible for the failure, especially since the other truck is apparently still running fine. I love it when speculation becomes fact.

[Unsullied_Spy]

My Zippy-H 5000 mAH 20-30C pack held up fine with a MGM 16018 and a Neu 1515 1.5D, there's nothing wrong with their cells as long as you don't get stupid with them.

[pasan]

Originally Posted by Unsullied_Spy

My Zippy-H 5000 mAH 20-30C pack held up fine with a MGM 16018 and a Neu 1515 1.5D, there's nothing wrong with their cells as long as you don't get stupid with them.

I too use a pair of those 3S packs in my E-Revo. Till recently I had punch at 0%, but eased off because drive shafts have started creaking. Waiting till they go completely bust to get a set of the new BLE/Summit CVAs.

[truggyracer1]

ok, the question i got is how can we purchase the MMM's and them reliable enough to run lesser packs? i cant afford some of the prices for "higher end" lipos so i guess i try it and cross my fingers?

[RC-Monster Mike]

Originally Posted by truggyracer1

ok, the question i got is how can we purchase the MMM's and them reliable enough to run lesser packs? i cant afford some of the prices for "higher end" lipos so i guess i try it and cross my fingers?

The answer is to not expect the performance of a higher end pack out of the low priced pack you can afford. If you can't afford the "Ferrari" then you can't afford it, but you can't buy a "Chevy" and complain that it isn't a "Ferrari", either.
It isn't the low end packs in and of themselves - it is the low end packs being used like high end packs that are the issue. If you want to see the 60mph speed on the box of the ERevo, you need to have Ferrari packs to do it reliably. If you have the Chevy packs, then don't try to reach Ferrari speeds and you should be fine.

[Jeremy1976]

Originally Posted by RC-Monster Mike

The answer is to not expect the performance of a higher end pack out of the low priced pack you can afford. If you can't afford the "Ferrari" then you can't afford it, but you can't buy a "Chevy" and complain that it isn't a "Ferrari", either.
It isn't the low end packs in and of themselves - it is the low end packs being used like high end packs that are the issue. If you want to see the 60mph speed on the box of the ERevo, you need to have Ferrari packs to do it reliably. If you have the Chevy packs, then don't try to reach Ferrari speeds and you should be fine.

Great metaphor!

Originally Posted by Jeremy1976

Great metaphor!

Would be BUT, there are a couple of Chevy products that will run with a Ferrari. The Z06 Corvette and the ZR1 Corvette. There's always a fly that will land in the ointment.

[MetalMan]

Originally Posted by RC-Monster Mike

The answer is to not expect the performance of a higher end pack out of the low priced pack you can afford. If you can't afford the "Ferrari" then you can't afford it, but you can't buy a "Chevy" and complain that it isn't a "Ferrari", either.
It isn't the low end packs in and of themselves - it is the low end packs being used like high end packs that are the issue. If you want to see the 60mph speed on the box of the ERevo, you need to have Ferrari packs to do it reliably. If you have the Chevy packs, then don't try to reach Ferrari speeds and you should be fine.

Or, run two such Chevys in parallel to achieve the Ferrari capabilities

[lincpimp]

Originally Posted by MetalMan

Or, run two such Chevys in parallel to achieve the Ferrari capabilities

Nah, not even close... Nothing like a ferrari... Not that I really like them that much, but they are fun to drive. Like comparing a 4 cyl sportbike to a built buell. Anything that can turn high rpms and pull stupid speed is in a league of its own..

[sikeston34m]

Originally Posted by RC-Monster Mike

The answer is to not expect the performance of a higher end pack out of the low priced pack you can afford. If you can't afford the "Ferrari" then you can't afford it, but you can't buy a "Chevy" and complain that it isn't a "Ferrari", either.
It isn't the low end packs in and of themselves - it is the low end packs being used like high end packs that are the issue. If you want to see the 60mph speed on the box of the ERevo, you need to have Ferrari packs to do it reliably. If you have the Chevy packs, then don't try to reach Ferrari speeds and you should be fine.

Ummmm..........I don't understand!

The Chevy packs would be the best ones.

Now if you had said "Ford Packs", I could understand the lower quality.

[emaxxnitro]

Originally Posted by sikeston34m

Ummmm..........I don't understand!

The Chevy packs would be the best ones.

Now if you had said "Ford Packs", I could understand the lower quality.

right on! rofpimp!

[JThiessen]

Well, there have been failures on other packs as well - most recently on a set of Mikes packs. Whether or not these failures had anything to do with the batteries, I'm not qualified to answer. (or if having a different set would have prevented the failure).

[shizzon]

Originally Posted by JThiessen

Well, there have been failures on other packs as well - most recently on a set of Mikes packs. Whether or not these failures had anything to do with the batteries, I'm not qualified to answer. (or if having a different set would have prevented the failure).

hopefully your not talking about my mistake of hooking up mikes 5s 2500mAh packs in series instead of parallel, that is obviously not the monsters fault when it failed.

And on a side note the packs performance is off the charts!!! Thanks Mike!