Could Vancouver 2010 be the next 9/11?

[redshift]

Well I have no desire to make enemies, so I will leave amicably.

ZP happens to be intelligent far beyond his years, I don't know if he's college-educated, and honestly I don't care.

Again I have no opinion on the Vancouver scenario, but how many of you have fallen for the simple chainletter scam hehe.. I'd be willing to bet, more than one!

I could heap up evidence, as I know ZP can as well. But it's in vain. And it'll change nothing. If anyone thinks I'm cowering in the corner with this, PM me. I just have too much respect for the forum to continue with this.

I graciously depart from thread...

Back to a serious level, I still truly believe it was a miracle that the towers collapsed the way they did. Can you imagine the utter devastation and chaos if either or both of the towers fell sideways? As terrible as it was, it could have been much, much worse.

In any case, try to create a conspiracy theory around these facts, mkay?

[YOUTUBE]bMZ-nkYr46w[/YOUTUBE]

[zeropointbug]

Thiessen, please don't use the degree game, I know many people with degrees that are dumber than shit, literally, ignorant, and loud mouth fools. You have yet to put forth some credible evidence besides attacking me saying I'm 19 (I'm 23 if you must know). So if you think degrees mean something, then why have 800+ and growing architects and engineers joined the AE9/11truth movement in the USA? What do you call that phenomenon?

Freezebyte, since when is speculation considered evidence? That video is science fraud, the whole video is full of assumptions as if they were facts! Makes me sick. I bet you haven't even watched the video I posted have you? There is heaps and heaps of evidence for the "conspiracy" side of this, and what does the official story present you? Nothing, but a far out story about some men from caves with box cutters that managed to slip past the pentagon, CIA, FBI, NSA, IRS, homeland security, the military, whatever else.... and crash not one, not two, not even three planes, but four, don't you think that seems a little far fetched?

[zeropointbug]

Also, Thiessen, I said try and explain WTC 7, you said they pulled it? Well, seeing as it takes weeks to plan and carry out a demolition project like that, I can't see that happening on the morning of 9/11. Here is an idea, maybe they set all the charges in the few weeks before when they have power shut downs, bomb sniffing dogs removed, and during that time the building had abnormally high levels of dust and contaminants in the air. Maybe you want to go tell all the firefighters who were actually there that they never heard bombs going off, that they never saw floor by floor explosions? Are you going to go call them liars?

Remember this, the best place the hide something is in plain sight.

[JThiessen]

Originally Posted by zeropointbug

Thiessen, please don't use the degree game, I know many people with degrees that are dumber than shit, literally, ignorant, and loud mouth fools. You have yet to put forth some credible evidence besides attacking me

Um - no, that's actually not true. You chose to ignore the facts that I did state. Using the example of experience is not a game. Its real life. There is a reason that, generally speaking, people without credentials dont achieve levels of being "an authority figure". Its not about the piece of paper, its about the knowledge gained. Its not about reading something on a website - its about seeing it happen in real life, and seeing why things do and dont work. I dont care what your opinion is, I do care that you have made statements regarding facts that simply arent true (I will use the 757 engine statment as an example). Yes, that entire chain of events was technically feasible.

And tell me this. What would you tell a six year old that argues with you that Santa Clause is real (assuming you weren't concerned with their feelings)? The reason they can believe is because they haven't experienced enough to be able to rationally make the connections. I see the same thing here.

If all this stuff that you've gathered from these various websites were true, more credible sources would have been all over it, and you'd see nothing but this on the news. I fear that your sources are the modern equivelent of tabloid news papers - I can start a website and put anything I want on it, and do it without retribution.

The civil engineers are saying that the buildings may not have been built to the specs that were claimed by the builder. They couldn't prove that because the debris was removed in a manner that facilitated them finding the bodies, as opposed to a method that allowed the engineers to study the dynamics of the collapse.

As far as explosions after the fact, consider this.
You have many broken gas lines. You have uncontrolled electrical sparking. What do you think is going to happen when those two are combined in a devastation zone like there was there? Have you ever been in a building right after an earthquake almost completely demolished it? There is gas everywhere, and there are electrical lines everywhere. I almost didn't make it out because of the gas. The building next to mine exploded - but it had been relatively stable during the quake - same effect as #7. And its not just the gas that can cause the explosions - its the dust. Once the ppm gets high enough, just a static spark can blow up an entire building (being from where you are from, do a search on grain elevator explosions).

Gotta run - wifey says she wants some...

honestly this thread is hopeless,as one of the apparently uneducated fools that sees 9/11 as a true terrorist attack,arguing is pointless.please close this thread!--josh

whenever you get off your soapbox,people might actually pay attention......im done now.--josh

[zeropointbug]

How about you actually read it, and stop being so bloody ignorant.

how about you stop acting like you have something to prove and stop trying to force your opinion down everyone elses throat. if your so certain your right,get off your computer chair AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!--josh

[zeropointbug]

One man can't do anything, you need a collective force, of which you can only achieve by educating people... it's a bit tricky when they are sheeple instead.

[rawfuls]

Not to sprinkle the sprinkles over the ice cream, (lol), but doesn't steel have a higher melting temperature than jet fuel burns at? and also used some fire retardant over the steel?

Probably wrong...

[zeropointbug]

Originally Posted by rawfuls

Not to sprinkle the sprinkles over the ice cream, (lol), but doesn't steel have a higher melting temperature than jet fuel burns at?

Probably wrong...

Yes, there is no way the amount of fuel left over from the explosion of the crash on the Towers was enough even remotely weaken the steel... nor would there be enough fuel (air) for the combustion to burn hot enough. They used some of the best steel alloy available for the structures core. Absolutely massive.

[zeropointbug]

Rootar, I don't give up... and I want to do it here cuz I like you guys. :)

[rootar]

yea give it a rest no one gives a rats ass about your damn rant. Go find some other place to do it.....