Quote:
Originally Posted by simplechamp
The fact is that there is no empirical data showing one type of ESC being more likely to fail or dangerous than any other. Everything is just anecdotal: "There's more pictures on the internet of this one melted down" or "Well 3 guys at my club had this brand of ESC smoke on them". Even failure rates reported by Castle or Tekin have many variables that are unaccounted for, so it's questionable to call that empirical data also, but it's the closest we'll get.
|
I think we need to make a distinction between failure and potential for injury. My point is that the MMM doesn't seem to only fail, it seems to do it in a rather dangerous (and thats the V3, I haven't even begun to look at the V1 and V2 disasters). Suppose there is even a 0.1% failure rate. Now out of the million say, Toyota Corollas made each year, if 0.1% caught alight, that means there are 1000 fireballs. I can tell you right now, there'd be a public outcry if 1000 Corollas blew up in a year, but with the MMM people seem to tolerate it and even justify it. That makes no sense to me. Perhaps people don't place as high a value on personal safety and the safety of those around them that I do. So many of these brushless "experts" are chiming in on "misuse" but it's for sale in RTR packages, and with that the assumption has to be clear that not many RTR runners are experts and the electronics should have some sort of tolerance as a result.
Tell me is this misuse?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4GbTiqeS-Q
RC clubs (at least around here) do not want potential fireballs, that's why we run hard cased lipos, and why IMO if an ESC is proven to be susceptable to combustion in the event of a failure, then banning the use of it is perfectly reasonable in the interests of safety. I am yet to see a picture of an RX8 burnt to a crisp.