RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#16)
Nick
COOKIES!
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,310
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England, York
05.21.2005, 10:27 AM

10L & 9918 it looks like then. :D

Thanks alot, just need to order another pair of cells and an extra 2 to jump to 16. Then some differentials/CVDS and stuffage.

UBEC too, I heard this can cut runtime? But then I really can't be botherd having more cells in my truck to power things.

Can't wait to go Brushless, know someone who thinks hes unstoppable with a 18.97KWF and Hacker B50(10L) on 16 cells - now I can compete. :D


~ Nick.

Last edited by Nick; 05.21.2005 at 10:32 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
Serum
RC-Monster Admin
 
Serum's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
05.21.2005, 11:43 AM

Ubec doesn't take that much. you probably won't notice it.

are you planning on mixing used cells with new and unused cells?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
Nick
COOKIES!
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,310
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England, York
05.21.2005, 02:19 PM

I will be buying a new pair and make a fresh 2x 8cell packs (3600s).

Then buy 2 more new cells to go on my current used 3300s.

None are matched.


~ Nick.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
Nick
COOKIES!
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,310
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England, York
06.14.2005, 05:35 PM

*Update*

I have thought about a brushless setup further, and thinking of just a 14 cell setup instead of 16, my reason being a want rid of the hump pack, to avoid batteries falling out, which I truely think is the problem and don't want to discuss that in this thread again, lol.

Is it possible to get the same sort of performance of a 10L using 16 cells with 14 cells and a different motor?

Or should I just go for the basic 9L?


~ Nick.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
RC-Monster Mike
Site Owner
 
RC-Monster Mike's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,915
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
06.14.2005, 05:39 PM

The 9L on 14 cells will be similar to the 10L on 16 cells. The 16 cell setup will always have potentially more power, but with the same gearing, the 9l and 14 cells would be right there with the 10L and 16 cells.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#21)
Nick
COOKIES!
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,310
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England, York
06.14.2005, 05:41 PM

Whats the Lehner equivalent? How would it be in comparison to the 9L?


~ Nick.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#22)
maxxdude1234
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
maxxdude1234's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 675
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
06.14.2005, 05:46 PM

The 2800XL is the closest to the 9L. The 2 are pretty much identical, but the lehner is more efficient (maybe a tiny tiny bit quicker).
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23)
RC-Monster Mike
Site Owner
 
RC-Monster Mike's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,915
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
06.14.2005, 05:47 PM

Xl2400 or xl2800 would be in the same power output range. The Lehners get a little better runtimes ans slightly faster acceleration, but the performance is very close.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24)
Nick
COOKIES!
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,310
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England, York
06.14.2005, 05:51 PM

You mentioned the XL2400 for 16 cells too, is this faster than than the XL2800 then, or more power?


~ Nick.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#25)
RC-Monster Mike
Site Owner
 
RC-Monster Mike's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,915
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
06.14.2005, 05:55 PM

The xl2800 is fatser, given the same cell count and gearing. the 9L under load would perform somewhere in between these two motors.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#26)
Nick
COOKIES!
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,310
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England, York
06.14.2005, 06:03 PM

I guess the XL2800 is the "Basic XL2800" which you mention?
http://www.rc-monster.com/proddetail...rxl2800&cat=20

I noticed most brushless motors have 3 wires, whats the 3rd extra one for?


~ Nick.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#27)
Serum
RC-Monster Admin
 
Serum's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
06.15.2005, 01:22 AM

Yes, it is the basix XL2800.

The three wires serve other purposes than with brushed. You need three of them, to make the whole magnetic field fly around the magnet, pushing it forward. It is the princple of the Mono-rail magnetic field train. That is the reason you need a fancy controller as well.

here, check this;



It is a 4 pole, but the goal of the three wires stays the same. A 2 pole brushless motor has got 2 poles on the internal magnet. (N+S)
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#28)
Rannick
RC-Monster Stock
 
Rannick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 19
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Germany
Question 06.16.2005, 06:26 AM

Mike u seem very familiar with the lehner motors.
can u tell me the difference between a lehner basic and a lehner basic XL?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#29)
RC-Monster Mike
Site Owner
 
RC-Monster Mike's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,915
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
06.16.2005, 03:48 PM

The basic xl is about twice the size - better for monster trucks!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#30)
Serum
RC-Monster Admin
 
Serum's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
06.16.2005, 04:56 PM

the basic is nice for 1/10th cars and 2wd smaller trucks. (or a lightweight 4wd buggy)
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com