RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   Brushless (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Anyone run a 2230? (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6442)

pb4ugo 04.16.2007 11:55 AM

Anyone run a 2230?
 
Looking for feedback on the 2230. Especially compared to a 1950. Will the larger diameter produce that much more power?

Enough to overcome the shorter length?

BTW, I tried the search, but ended up with alot of 2240 info.

Dafni 04.16.2007 12:20 PM

I never had a 2230 myself, but not too long ago I saw a CEN MT with a 2230.
I felt with the same voltage I'd still take my 1950. It was very nice and powerfull, but nothing that made me go WOW. I stick to my 1950s.

Serum 04.16.2007 12:59 PM

the CEN as published on rc-independent daf?

i guess so?

Don't expect too big of a difference between a 1950 and a 2230.

don't know if you knew; the 1950 has got a 19mm diameter rotor, which is 50mm long and the 2230 uses a 22mm diameter rotor which is 30mm long.

i doubt if you would notice a difference between a 1940 and a 1950 to be honest. Both are capable of more than enough torque, and both are capable of producing the same power (battery limitations)

Dafni 04.16.2007 01:18 PM

No, it was not the one in the mag. Not the nice one, unfortunately not.
Alex from BK has a Genesis too. He kept going on about it like it was the best thing ever.

Serum 04.16.2007 01:20 PM

Too bad.. LOL

if you see the shafts, they should be able to run a 1:1 car... Looks.. that's what it is.. Too big.. Too heavy.. everthing is just 'too' on that thing IMO..

pb4ugo 04.16.2007 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serum
the CEN as published on rc-independent daf?

i guess so?

Don't expect too big of a difference between a 1950 and a 2230.

don't know if you knew; the 1950 has got a 19mm diameter rotor, which is 50mm long and the 2230 uses a 22mm diameter rotor which is 30mm long.

i doubt if you would notice a difference between a 1940 and a 1950 to be honest. Both are capable of more than enough torque, and both are capable of producing the same power (battery limitations)

That's what I was hoping for. I love my 1950, but a project I'm working on would benefit from the shorter length of the 2230.

I'm also worried the 1940 would struggle with 14-15 lbs of truck to haul.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.