View Single Post
Old
  (#93)
sikeston34m
RC-Monster Brushless
 
sikeston34m's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,085
Join Date: Sep 2007
11.22.2009, 10:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lutach View Post
MA could've done something like this: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1078049, but I think the MA boys don't know how to hack the graphs to make them look good and that's the reason they don't post anything. Here's a thread with good results so far: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...1143540&page=2.

sikeston34m post your info there and call out the MA guys to see what they can say about the reject cells .
Those guys are watching this thread. That's why they accused you and BN of playing games between there and "another" forum.

It's because they are watching this thread and the "60C really?" thread.

They are alot of "Talk". The proof is in the pudding.

That's why we should put these packs up against their "Green" packs on legit discharge equipment. Or at least an Eagletree running the same setup.

I really enjoyed seeing the discharge graphs in the link you posted Lutach.

I do believe these are holding voltage above 3.0 - 3.1 volts per cell right up to the very end. The discharge curve is VERY flat and at the end they drop suddenly.

I'm tempted to setup my E Revo with these also, then buy another Automotive charger.

Picture two Monster Trucks geared for 40mph, being charged in less than 10 minutes, only to do another 30 minute run.

It's a play all day kinda setup.
   
Reply With Quote