RC-Monster Forums - View Single Post

BrianG · 04.09.2007, 02:38 PM

Very true Serum. It's like saying two cars are the same if they use the same piston.

We already know they behave differently, so the programming is obviously different. The Quark is much smoother, but heats up more than the MM. The Quark also seems like it has beefier traces and stouter construction. Don't get me wrong, the MM is a nice controller (especially for the money), but I still like the Quark better for larger vehicles. And let's not forget that the Quark can run pretty much any motor. The MM tries to cram as much circuitry as possible is a smaller area so thermal concentration will be higher.

Personally, the Quark would be THE controller if it had a better heatsink (or maybe just get rid of those stupid thermal pads), computer programming function, and lower price.

	(#15)
BrianG RC-Monster Admin Offline Posts: 14,609 Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Des Moines, IA	04.09.2007, 02:38 PM Very true Serum. It's like saying two cars are the same if they use the same piston. We already know they behave differently, so the programming is obviously different. The Quark is much smoother, but heats up more than the MM. The Quark also seems like it has beefier traces and stouter construction. Don't get me wrong, the MM is a nice controller (especially for the money), but I still like the Quark better for larger vehicles. And let's not forget that the Quark can run pretty much any motor. The MM tries to cram as much circuitry as possible is a smaller area so thermal concentration will be higher. Personally, the Quark would be THE controller if it had a better heatsink (or maybe just get rid of those stupid thermal pads), computer programming function, and lower price.