RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
BrianG
RC-Monster Admin
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
04.09.2007, 02:38 PM

Very true Serum. It's like saying two cars are the same if they use the same piston.

We already know they behave differently, so the programming is obviously different. The Quark is much smoother, but heats up more than the MM. The Quark also seems like it has beefier traces and stouter construction. Don't get me wrong, the MM is a nice controller (especially for the money), but I still like the Quark better for larger vehicles. And let's not forget that the Quark can run pretty much any motor. The MM tries to cram as much circuitry as possible is a smaller area so thermal concentration will be higher.

Personally, the Quark would be THE controller if it had a better heatsink (or maybe just get rid of those stupid thermal pads), computer programming function, and lower price.
  Send a message via Yahoo to BrianG Send a message via MSN to BrianG  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
skellyo
RC-Monster Brushless
 
skellyo's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,466
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
04.09.2007, 03:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG
Personally, the Quark would be THE controller if it had a better heatsink (or maybe just get rid of those stupid thermal pads), computer programming function, and lower price.
And if it ran 6S like it's supposed to.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
04.09.2007, 04:02 PM

Not everyone is having trouble with it on 6s, but yes, still it should be able to do 6s LiPo without issue no matter what.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
BrianG
RC-Monster Admin
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
04.09.2007, 04:08 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by skellyo
And if it ran 6S like it's supposed to.
yes, I guess that too...

ZPB: Who isn't having trouble with the Quark on 6s? AFAIK, everyone has reported issues. The only time it seems to work is if you let the pack discharge a little so it's not at exactly 4.2v/cell.

I wonder what the result would be if you set the charging CC/CV threshold to something like 4.1v/cell or 4.15v/cell? Anyone want to donate a 6s pack for me to try? :)

Last edited by BrianG; 04.09.2007 at 04:12 PM.
  Send a message via Yahoo to BrianG Send a message via MSN to BrianG  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
04.09.2007, 04:37 PM

Really, I thought not everyone was having issues?

I wonder how 7s A123 pack would do? Same 25.2 volts at fully charged. However, you CAN use a 3.45 volts to charge, I think you get about 95% charge, and takes a little longer (3.45 float charge voltage), so that's 24.15 right off charger. But as soon as you discharge a little bit out of an A123, the voltage goes down to operating nom. volts instantly. I bet a 7s A123 might work fine.

It's basically a problem of discharge curve, and voltage droop of batts. If batteries had a very good discharge curve (like A123, or better) and very little droop, you would need less cells to get the working voltage. It's better for everything really...

Altair Nano cells are going to be 2.4 volts/cell, which is nice, gives you more voltage options. They also would last a lifetime, LITERALLY, they have put 10's thousands of discharge cycles on them at 10C discharge/10C charge, they retain over 85% capacity still at that point (16,000 was the latest figure)


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com